What evidence is there of police bias against blacks?

> In its study, the Post found that men were 22.9 times more likely than women to be shot and killed by officers. No one suggests that law enforcement bias accounts for this huge multiple, which is undoubtedly caused by differences in behavior between men and women. In the case of racial multiples, police bias cannot be ruled out, but it is reasonable to assume that the multiples are explained by race differences in behavior.
> The Washington Post noted further that all but 93 of the 990 people fatally shot by police were armed, usually with a firearm or knife. The un rmed victims had the following racial distribution:
> - White: 34.4 percent (32 victims)
> - Black: 40.8 percent (38)
> - Hispanic: 19.4 percent (18)
> - Asian: 0 percent (0)
> - Unknown: 5.4 percent (5)
> An unarmed black was therefore 5.6 times more likely than an unarmed white to be shot by police, and a Hispanic was 2.6 times more likely. The black multiple is certainly high, though not that much higher than the California violent-arrest multiple of 5.35 noted above.
blame leftist criminologists, who have deliberately gone out of their way not to get more granular data

>california:

>As noted in Table 4 above (see left), in California—a large state that keeps consistent statistics on race and ethnicity—blacks are arrested for violent crimes at 5.35 times the white rate, and Hispanics at 1.42 times the white rate. The low likelihood of Asians being killed by police is in keeping with low Asian arrest rates for violent crime. The black and Hispanic multiples for police shooting deaths are well within the arrest multiples—the black multiple is less than half—and certainly do not suggest undisciplined police violence.

>every reported case of a fatal shooting by the police
>reported case
>report

>blame leftist criminologists
blame for what?

the data was not collected by criminologists or leftists
>confused

BLM sure as shit isn't marching over unreported murders. If they were, they wouldn't be unreported. >_

Breakdown of all states

instead of

>haha new York
>haha California

...

So what's your stance?

I don't want to invalidate your statement

but the relevance seems to lack.

What are your points, again? Are you trying to establish that there is A) an organization that protests and B) there some are reported murders?

"unarmed" doesn't mean not dangerous. A decent percentage of cops killed in action died by their own gun, after a perp wrestled control of it.

>decent percentage
your lack of source is glaring, so no need to further reiterate.

>what's your stance
masochistic empath

>cops restrained from using violence
>cops stop intervening for fear of being killed
>violence against cops goes down
Brilliant

It isn't necessarily easy to measure. The only thing an arrest means is that a cop decided to arrest you. Also, just because someone commits a crime doesn't mean they will be arrested.
Also take a look at white collar crimes. Those guys are rarely arrested. They are also mostly done by white people and have a far larger impact on the nation than a robbery at a 7/11.

I mean, that's one way of thinking. I'm sure that comes into play at some point. Another train of thought, that is also applicable, lower levels of escalation.

>liberal bastion Washington Post says 90% were armed
>paragons of bias-free reporting FatalEncounters.org and KilledByPolice.net say 31% were armed

Look at arrests vs convictions of whites vs blacks.

Blacks are arrested more, but those arrests lead to fewer convictions than whites.

You can also look at things like specific crimes. Drug use among blacks and whites is at about the same rate, but it's mostly blacks that are arrested and charged for drug crimes.

I realize that cops tend to recruit "meathead" types and aren't necessarily hired for their brains or empathy, but isn't it arrogant to assume that cops wouldn't best know how to handle a situation to optimize for their own personal safety?see bud. race of those arrested is in line with race of perps reported by victims

How many people do you think really read the Washington Post or watch CNN? Not that many. Do you really believe all liberals are being "brainwashed" because they get their information from a single source? I'm assuming so. Do you know why you believe that? Because that's how you operate. /pol/ gets all of its new and information from a small list of sources they have been brainwashed into believing are the "real" sources.

i actually think WaPo would have better figures here. that post actually wasn't intended to denigrate

That doesn't mean false arrests aren't made. There is still a larger gap between black arrests vs convictions than there is for whites. You also ignored the drug issue.

convictions aren't a police issue
i'll give you the drug issue. mandatory minimum sentences and the CIA pushing crack cocaine gutted black communities imo

> arrogant to assume that cops wouldn't best know how to handle a situation to optimize for their own personal safety

No, because the individual mind is shaped by experience. If an empirical method has shown to work, it may be applied again. If the empirical method is not the best, or smartest, then I don't see how it's arrogant to assume they're ignorant about their own safety.

>aren't necessarily hired for their brains or empathy

They do their best, ideally, but police forces are not typically (to my knowledge) renowned for analytical skills.

Up

victimization statistics match with arrest statistics, so it's safe to assume that blacks are more criminal on average

None in fact it has been debunked by a black Harvard professor
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/11/no-racial-bias-police-shootings-study-harvard-prof/

No bias here lads

>Drug use among blacks and whites is at about the same rate
according to self reporting
guess which population group is more likely to falsely self report

>a professor
Oh that settles it then

>what evidence is there of police bias against blacks?
unverifiable and uneducated readings of various statistics provided by the same government that employs the said cops

and the allegory of the cave suggests that it all ended after Rodney King

This is not science. This is not math. Fuck off.

glad we agree

Uhhhhh
>not math

Data transformations??

>not science
>not math

butthurt

what you're doing is not the scientific method. Nor is there any formulas proving your point, or supporting your point, which is literally apologist, speculative, and wishful thinking.

I'll bite....

Https://plato.standford.edu/entries/scientific-method

>systematic observarion
>experimentation
>inductive & deductive reasoning
>formation of testing hypothesis and theories

....

Is it your idea that data analysis is "one size fits all" ¿

>your point
>your point

so what recommendations would you make to study this subject scientifically?

or are you throwing your hands up and saying that there is no way to study things that under the domain of the hard sciences scientifically?

your cite doesn't link to anything, so you'r being intentionally intellectually dishonest. the scientific method is a clear cut method to obtain empirical evidence which you have not done. Once again, you are a coward, who tries to hide beneath a transparent veneer of questioning, when you come here at a time in the USA when blacks riot in the streets and torture people in support of your racist theories. Intentionally stoking animosity, and then pinning the violence on police officers.

study criminology and law, and you'll have your answer.
>no way to study things
you sound like an idiot

I'm bummed about you aha.

If you type the words in, they work :-)

Whether or not science should be limited to solely empirical evidence is debated...

>stroking animosity

sending love your way

>Whether or not science should be limited to solely empirical evidence is debated...
make your case then, tell me youd rather have logical reasoning to your retarded theories

>white people get more traffic stops in the winter

Crunch the numbers and this is true for EVERY police department. The reason for it? There's less daylight hours in the wintertime, and cops are more likely to pull over a white guy if it's too dark to see what they're white!

Police don't just have a bias against black people. They have a bias against whites!

>a qualified researcher debunks a claim with statistics
>ad hominem attack the researcher not the data

you all sound like Jews

>No one suggests that law enforcement bias accounts for this huge multiple
I would suggest that.

also, assertions starting with
>undoubtedly caused by
are supposition and should be immediately questioned

the fact that police officers aren't found guilty of this is proof that its not systemic. Meanwhile, the suspect is almost always, should he not be killed while he resists arrest, found guilty of resisting a lawful order from a police officer.

>the fact that police officers aren't found guilty of this is proof that its not systemic
Only if the courts are unbiased.

>the system is not racist, because the system determined that it's not racist
that's just circular logic to someone who believes in systemic racism.
you can't win with those people

if police are systemically biased but courts are not systemically biased, you would see more acquittals for equivalent crimes among accused blacks (because the courts would find the unjustly accused people innocent) and equal sentence severity for blacks and whites

neither of those two cases are true, so either both systems are biased or neither are. we know it's not the case that police are unbiased but courts are biased because sentencing severity is unequal between blacks and whites

given the evidence, i'm fairly convinced that both systems are biased

>retarded axoims without logical reasoning
you are in no position to make axioms when you have no education in logic and no formulas to proove you claims. Stop being retarded with your imaginary cases that don't exist

of course there's bias. how could they not be at least slightly biased by their experiences? it's probably very frustrating for them when they hear their bias is evil/irrational when it's a natural thought pattern resulting from the fact that blacks commit more violent crime.

There is no bias. Niggers are more prone to violent behavior.