After learning about the double slit experiment...

After learning about the double slit experiment, I've come to wonder whether consciousness is fundamental to every physical process.

If so, then doesn't there need to be a conscious entity for the big bang to have happened?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/8ORLN_KwAgs?t=1m50s
chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

We were created. Anyone who says otherwise should be shot, on the spot.

No. The universe doesn't care about what you think. Observer doesn't matter, only thing that matters with double slit is conservation of energy momentum and he Isenberg uncertainty.

>After learning about the double slit experiment, I've come to wonder whether consciousness

You do NOT understand the double slit experiment. All it shows is that observation (need to alter the photons to observe them) can change results. Why is this somehow confused with "consciousness"? The problem is the term "observation" is not clearly defined.

youtu.be/8ORLN_KwAgs?t=1m50s

Entanglement is in regular 4 dimensional space-TIME. Entangled particles are "together" in space AND time till observation.

>The universe doesn't care about what you think.

How do you know that?

Because the double slit results are produced whether or not conciousness is involved.

"I regard consciousness as fundamental" - Max Planck.

If consciousness doesn't exist, who's gonna perform the experiment in the first place, dumbass?