Von Neumann, Feynman and Ulam

Build nukes.

>How is it that the smartest man in history was not an atheist?
Have you ever seen an atheist in real life? They're literally angsty teenagers that can't go any deeper that "the bible isn't literally factually correct therefore god isn't real"

This.

Atheism is a bad religion.

If you don't believe, just don't. Don't go around preaching.

Atheists wouldn't need to be loudmouths if religious idiots didn't stick constantly try to stick their magical beliefs into the lives of people smart enough not to believe.
>How is it that the smartest man in history was not an atheist
Even the smartest man in history can be a coward that fears death. Smart people aren't super humans like some you autists believe. They're still badly evolved primates that are highly irrationa. Their overal nature doesn't change just because they're good at abstractions.
Yes. Ever been to a university? 90% of the professors will be atheists.
God damn some of you are smart but dumb.

>I wonder what they are talking about

>hey, either of you stick your dicks in atom bomb parts?
>i wiped my balls on the instrumentation
>
>i shit in oppenheimers office chair
>i fucked the physics package

There is literally nothing wrong with being a communist.

Shit, you're right...

Sure, as long as you stay in the closet, vote against communism, and never assert that you/society has a right to stuff that isn't yours.

Except for being fucking stupid, sure

PUA

I lost.

not sure if trolling

'
>magical beliefs
Your post only shows how little you understand of religion. If you can't go past le big wizard in the sky argument you should honestly just stay quiet because you're obviously not smart or knowledgeable enough.

>atheism is a religion

>s-stop arguing against me!
You rightcucks are disgusting because your political positions can't stand on their own merits so you feel the need to silence your opposition.

All the pussy Feynman had slain.

Religion: pursuit, interest, or movement, followed with great devotion.

Religion: Strict fidelity or faithfulness; conscientiousness; devotion to some principle

Oxford English Dictionary

Saying things are "absurd" or "magical" is not an argument.

Lol brainlets btfo by this definition. When will atheists accept that they are dogmatic?

What does politics have to do with the post you're replying to?

en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/religion
>1. The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
Nice cherrypicking you fucking faggot.

> Thinking oxforddictionaries.com is the same as the OED
> Not realizing words can have more than 1 definition

There are basically two ways to look at religion. As an early science or a social control mechanism. It's terrible at both attaining truth about the universe and at building prosperous modern civilizarions. We have superior methods now.

You chose a bullshit secondary definition that isn't commonly used because it was convenient for your """"argument"""". You are a fraud.

Include the grammatical errors, I'm fucking tired and phoneposting

% of the professors will be atheist
90% of statistics are made up on the spot

Ignore*
Kek.

pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/

And that's on americunts who are more religious about muh jesus than advanced Europeans.

"Let me try, surely in vain, to set the record straight as there are so many subtle but horrifying myths that the Left has created about Nash to suit their purposes. (1) His name has entered science largely through his theory of balance in conflict — the Nash Equilibrium. The first movie to get this wrong had him as a reclusive professor whose computer, Joshua, arrived at the conclusion, “Don’t Play” to avert nuclear armageddon. In fact a stable Nash Equilibrium that averts a nuclear holocaust is attained via Mutually Assured Destruction — peace through strength. This idea was previously lampooned by the Hollywood Left’s caricature of Nash’s mentor, John von Neumann, the mad man with the autonomous glove in How I Learned to Love the Bomb."

There are basically two ways to look at religion. As an early science or a social control mechanism.
Also the development of morality and consciousness.
>We have superior methods now.
What are they and what is the evidence of them being superior?

So ~50% are atheist?
And this was evidence for muh 90%?
Try again

Christcucks completely and utterly
BTFO
T
F
O

>I wonder what they are talking about
incinerating Germany

>Also the development of morality and consciousness.
That's linked directly with religion being a social control mechanism. What religions consider as morally 'good' are simply behaviours that were beneficial to the rulers of a bronze age society. You are severely blue pilled my friend.

independent.co.uk/news/science/atheists-more-intelligent-than-religious-people-faith-instinct-cleverness-a7742766.html

Religitards btfo!