Chart thread

>What kind of garbage biased chart is this?

That chart is for a predominately right wing board.

Is this a meme chart? Why is Confessions of a Mask fascist?

I despise political people so much

That simply is not true.

Has anyone read through a full chart before? Was it worth it for you and your interest in the topic?

I hate to debunk your argument, since I think they are great texts irrespective of political leaning - but yeah, I would recommend these books and I am a raging libtard.

I can, in fact, recommend another book that's not listed - Sorel's "On Violence", which deals with the transition of socialism to fascism in the 1920's and the basis of the collective anitrationalist myth.

Because Fascist is not an inherently derogatory term, Bigot.

why

There's nothing fascist about Confessions of a Mask unless you're implying fascists are gays in denial

docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub

Because literally everything they do it about their political party or stance. Instead of just making a nice chart about a topic, it has to be "LE POL CHART ON LE REDPILL BOOKS"

>redpill me on pol influence in the charts

A key advantage of reading some of the older books on political theory are precisely that they offer you a different view into how the discourse could be. Great example is actually found in presidential speeches - Lincolns were actually intended to communicate specific policies and rationally advocate for them. Nowadays, so much of what we see is rhetorical bandwagoning for the mass media.

Why do books make you angry?

...

Looks like you took the bluepill as a suppository.

>Nowadays, so much of what we see is rhetorical bandwagoning for the mass media.

From every side to be fair. The entire political game is now basically the X-Factor with middle aged rich people.

...

Butters?

...

the order of reading in these charts is very bad

anyone not living innawoods is a "political person"

Actual the vast majority of people aren't a political person from one election cycle to the next. They're uninformed on most issues and have no interest in properly engaging with their representatives or trying to do anything actually political. I'm sure they have some opinions on political issues but they're basically uninterested in politics because it's boring (which it often is).

Calling everybody a political person is like calling anyone who can drive a formula one racer.

love this one

>implying humans aren't innately political
I see someone didn't start with the Greeks

> implying that calling someone a political person is meaningless

Someone once posted a chart of books to read about Veeky Forums to give you knowledge and better ideas for biz. Does anybody on here perhaps have it?

>redpill me on redpilling

Finally a /pol/ recommended reading list that isn't absolute trash.

Does a Plato chart exist?

...

...

...

...

...

>spirituality
>no pseudo-dionysius
>no meister eckhart
>no cusanus

y woot m8?

>no naked lunch
>:(

imgur.com/a/l2I86

Is there one for Heidegger?

Naked Lunch is pretty obviously there. It's in the third row in the center.

I don't get the final joke here. Is it saying that the book is akin to cataract surgery, because you will cease to be figuratively blind after reading it, or are you saying that reading the book will cause you to require cataract surgery, because of how long and detailed it is?