And totally shit at worst
How can I know if I'm autistic/asperger as an adult?
Considering that psychology is pseudoscience at best
Thomas Jackson
Other urls found in this thread:
usapl.liftingdatabase.com
nature.com
news.harvard.edu
google.com
twitter.com
Benjamin Morris
Autism and asperger syndrome are spooks (i.e., not real).
Robert Sullivan
I agree with you, but stop calling everything a spook, it makes you look like a total faggot cocksucker. I read his book, and I'm sure even Stirner himself wouldn't act like you guys do
Jacob Cox
Memes aside, is psychology, pseudoscience?
Easton Morgan
Yes, Mark. Find a psychologist who deadlifts more than 450 lbs. You won't find a single one, cause psychologists are all faggots and psychology is retarded.
Don't believe me? Look up for how many psychology experiments can be put under the falsification principle: almost 0
Nolan Peterson
>faggot
Why the homophobia?
Brody Miller
>is psychology, pseudoscience?
Yes. You can't find examples of psychology publications using the scientific method.
Blake Kelly
Pic related
Also not only most pedos are gays, but most gays are pedos
Samuel Mitchell
>be a psychology major
>have American records in the deadlift lifting over 450lbs
It seems your argument is now invalid.
Noah Howard
Pics of you with face blurred and your mayor while you dl over 450
Blake Evans
I'll do you one better, here's my USAPL lifting profile back when I competed and set records in the 148lb class in 2014. I dead 560 now but I'm also 180lbs and hardly lift anymore.
Jacob Hill
Well, you won. Today
Ayden Russell
Source?
Jonathan Hughes
Really? That’s funny because i won the powerlifting squad competition two years in a row the second 24 year old ever to squats over 500 so I’m rly not sure what you’re meaning??
Logan Richardson
The fuck is a squad competition and plent of people younger than 24 can squat over 500lbs unless you're 165 or less. Even then it's not that rare.
Luke Powell
no
t. anyone who knows anything about psychology beyond reading wikipedia articles about psychoanalysis
Adam Bailey
>People still post this failed study that was riped to shreds not that long after it was publised
Carson Perry
>>People still post this failed study that was riped to shreds not that long after it was publised
source?
Josiah Ward
Who are you going to trust to tell you this? This board filled with clinically retarded high school and university kids, or the actual science and medical community which, by and large, knows more about these subjects than most people here including me?
Camden Brown
Psychology, imho should be couched more with existentialism, and literature.
If you want to understand youself, read a book or piece of literature.
Dont go for the self help crap.
I think literature places just enough emphasis on empirical ethics to be agreeable with psychology, versus trying to put it in with physics, or even medicine.
If you are more concerned about labels, just pick up the DSM V.
Isaac Turner
Actually the null hypothesis is crucial to all psychology studies. Or at least currently.
I think thats involved with the p score.
Jason Cruz
Nigga you need a PhD, to be considered a practising psychologist.
Good luck with your BA or AA
Christian Rivera
Adam Jenkins
>news.harvard.edu
>google.com
These are just blog posts, where are the journal publications?
Lincoln Perez
What do you think a journal is going to post a critique of another study? That almost never happens it's done through over channels. It's not buzzfeed it's Harvard.edu with exact quotes from the experts on the topics. You can read the study and look at the arguments they present yourself.
Thomas Gomez
>bunch of idiots who don't know shit about psycology
Even freud predicted a lot of things neurology would only find out decades latter, in neurological terms psycology makes total sense
>even shit like edipus complex fit with the first "cut" that happens in your brain, something neurology would find out in the 80's
Even if it cannot be replicated, the effects can be see in several subjects all over the world, autism is a real disease, even if cannot be iddentified other then by looking at simptons empirically, it is pure idiocracy claiming such condition does not exist