>not marrying a wealthy, employed woman who's the main bread earner so you can become a stay-at-home dad and work on your reading and writing
You're doing it wrong, anons.
Not marrying a wealthy...
Andrew Mitchell
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
Jayden Sanders
>implying you can find a woman who's willing to do this
Owen Hall
It's actually rather nice that we live in a society where men can be matrimonial parasites as well as women. It's no longer just a tool women use to capture men, the converse holds as well.
Still wouldn't risk putting myself at the mercy of the law to such a degree.
Brandon Cooper
Hypothetically:
Wife makes 350,000 a year to get taxed 33%
Husband makes under 50k but gets taxed at her rate.
33,500 a year.
5 Day a week daycare 8-5 is about 7-12k a year per child
thats a 9500 dollar profit a year, or 1/36th of what hypothetical wife makes, so that he can work 9-5 to not be a "parasite" and his kids can be at daycare all day with some pleb who cant do anything but be a shitty preschool teacher.
Joshua James
That's literally been my goal.
Michael Thompson
im trying to find a gorgeous patrician conservative white woman whose will accept a position subservient to my own while her wealthy family bankrolls my NEET lifestyle.
still waiting
Kevin Brown
She will cheat on you. Assuming you find her in the first place, which is very unlikely.
Hypergamy.
Joseph Russell
>getting my master's in math and planning on teaching part time
>gf is 7/10 Asian but is intelligent, from a traditional family, and in pharmacy
>she said it's totally cool if I homeschool our future kids and do domestics while she works fulltime
Robert Hill
>Asian
Not surprised that the low T cuck is with an Asian girl.
Jayden Sullivan
Good luck living on ninety five hundred dollars a year, brodie.
I'm not saying he's parasitical to society, there is no such thing as a general "society," I'm saying he is living off of his wife like a tapeworm. He is parasitizing her: regardless of his "profit," if he's not living for himself i.e. if he's relying on her resources, he is the definition of a parasite.
And I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that, either. I'm remarking that it's interesting to live at the first point in colonial or post-colonial human history where it's "socially acceptable" for about 1 billion people (Europe, North America, Australia, some parts of South America, Asia, and Africa) to let men "stay at home."
It's a new phenomenon at this level of technological advancement