What do you think of imaginary triangles, Veeky Forums?
What do you think of imaginary triangles, Veeky Forums?
Gavin Reyes
Josiah Baker
they are something...
Not sure if they are useful. Can they be used as a proof for anything?
Nathan Reed
Literally just a line
Jaxon Morris
As imaginary as your IQ, brainlet.
Robert White
So that would mean the height of the "triangle" is also [math]i[/math] so it satisfies the [math]\frac{1}{2}bh[/math] formula.
If you half it and make it into a "right-angled triangle" you'd get this, which also satisfies Pythagoras' Theorem.
Ryder Parker
I feel exactly the same about them as I do for negative triangles.
Adrian Sanchez
No, brainlet. Then the lengths of the other two sides would add up to two, not zero.
Henry Martinez
Those two are really making my brainlet brain light up, especially the right triangle
post more
Jaxon Kelly
this is a bullshit triangle because it violates the triangle inequality. for any given triangle with side lengths a, b and c with c being the longest side, c < a+b
2 is not less than 0+0. Not even a triangle. Not even an imaginary triangle. It's wankery. Stop having fun this instant.
Josiah Gutierrez
The right triangle explains the OP triangle. It's just OP's triangle cut in half.