time is distorted by the theory of relativity. if there were no time then y=mx+b would have no meaning and we would all teleport
Time travel hoax BUSTED
Camden Diaz
Zachary Collins
>Think more like a holographic type universe where everything is connected
That's such bullshit: holography means that quantum gravity in a volume is equivalent to some theory defined on the boundary of that volume (even that is unsure for finite regions of space -- AdS/CFT is exact but the boundary theory is defined on the boundary of all spacetime). That does not mean "everything is connected", just that the amount of entropy or information associated with a region is proportional to the surface area of the region, not its volume.
>in the same toroidal magneto/dielectic form
That's just nonsense.
Gibbering madness.
Brandon Price
youtube.com
Holograms can be cut into as many little pieces as you like and they will all have the same image. Kinda like how when you divide a magnet, it just turns into two smaller magnets and so on. It couldn't possibly be because light is somehow dependent on MAGNETISM and DIELECTIC INERTIA.
So these two things already blow the fuck out of any perceived "boundary" the universe has. It never began nor will end. 0 IS THE PLACEHOLDER, 1 IS THE PRINCIPAL.
>0 is the placeholder
You cannot derive something out of nothing. Such nonsense is for atomists who believe some magical special snowflake particle spawned the entire universe.
>1 is the principal
You cannot have everything at the same time for that would mean NO CHANGE occurs.
There are thousands of books on this, Plotinus would be a good start though.
>quantum gravity
Yeah lets just stick the word "quantum" in front of things and then make it completely. Gravity is no different then what most people call "magnetic attraction, magnetic repulsion". There is no attraction or repulsion in a magnet, it creates counter space that follows the right hand rule.
>Volume
Inertia and the loss of inertia is not volume.
Jason Edwards
The last time I've been on Veeky Forums was like 4 months ago.
This exact same copypasted thread was on the front page back then too.
Nicholas Roberts
>The processor receives instruction chronologically.
But this is the central fallacy of your argument I believe.
You are trying to justifying that time exists by basically assuming that it exists (receives instruction chronologically).
Charles Perry
lol. everything's a meme these days.
good one OP
William Richardson
>ya
Really?
Christopher Brooks
Games that don't simulate time don't have their characters teleport. Movement in them is simply relative to other events in the game.
Robert Murphy
What known particle physics would be thrown out if time is removed?
Computer code isn't time ordered in the sense that there's some mystical 4th dimension in it. The code is ordered relative to each other, not relative to some time-entity.
Blake Kelly
Time travel into the future is of course possible, although it's not as romantic as having a funny looking machine that you pull a lever on and meeting morlocks in the forests of a distant future society. You simply advance cryogenics enough to put people into liquid nitrogen and then wake them up after a period of time, and presto, time travel. If I knocked you out and did that to you and then woke you up in 500 years and told you it was time travel,would you get mad at me when my method was discovered and tell me it wasn't? Time is motion and by reducing them otion inside of you I can essentially make you 99.999% time-proofed.