3x3 thread, judge personalities

3x3 thread, judge personalities

This would be cool without the Zizek. Putting him next to Marxism-Leninism is gross to me. Don't recognize top right and bottom right though.

Herbert Marcuse and Gianni Vattimo

Intelligent individual that was stupid a few years ago but did a great job of educating himself & grew up.

I which spooks you used to believe in OP? You matured, it shows.

National Bolshevism

P cool, bottom-left should probably go.

Yup. You de-spooked yourself a great chunk there, you seem way more free from ideology now.

Do you know anything about Leo Tolstoy? Recommended, he works are great.

Very good, would be happier with more muslims

cool faces
two are painted

5paint

My own philosophy boils down to civilization and agriculture was a mistake though I am still pondering whatever it might be humanity itself that was a mistake

you smell bad and have to bite your tongue a lot because you don't want people to know about your weird convictions
62nd thesis
i only recognize teddy, linkola, thoreau, and zerzan. based on them, pretty good taste, but thoreau doesn't fit in. you probably also smell bad and have a lot of anxiety because your habits don't align with your beleifs

Utopian idealist
2pure4me
don't forget to bring toilet paper with you when you self-exile

>but thoreau doesn't fit in
You can agree with certain ideas but disregard the others. I disagree heavily with Guillaume Faye, but added him nonetheless.

Others in the picture are John Michael Greer, Daniel Quinn and Derrick Jensen.

Not even memeing

...

needs to read more
probably shouldn't be on Veeky Forums

>probably shouldn't be on Veeky Forums

Why do you say that?

>Nietzsche and communism in the same image
Lmao kys cuck
Leftism is a spook, nigger

who is the chink and who is 1st row 2nd column

>being underage in current year

Pro-tip: if your picture has Cuckus Aurelius in it you need to leave.

lefty/10

those guys would have been disgusted by it

Zhuangzi and Rorty

Who are the ones on the top middle and center of the chart? They're the only ones that I haven't read from that grid.

Facebook would certainly disgust them much more.

>those guys would have been disgusted by it
Sure but they'd be disgusted by society in general so whats to be done

Burroughs would probably be okay with it, but yeah, I'd agree.

Emil Cioran on top and Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn in the middle.

...

>agriculture was a mistake
Im glad people like us exist

>tfw don't have 9 yet

FUCK OFF WITH THIS CANCER KEEP THIS SHIT ON MU YOU FUCKING RETARD THIS IS JUST USING LIT AS A FASHION PIECE IT'S LITERALLY JUST SAYING "HEY LOOK AT ME I LIKE THIS STUFF ARENT I UNIQUE"

Which computer program is used to output these files?

I tried using Microsoft Paint but I can't resize the images that I find on Google Images to fit the outlines initially drawn on Microsoft Paint using the "Straight Line" tool.

list your people and i'll do it for you

There's a site called mosaic maker you can use

Adorno, Nietzsche, Lacan, Deleuze, Heidegger, Kierkegaard, Hegel, Plato, Foucault/Derrida

Do you believe in apocatastasis?

Hi. You are not the person he was replying to. I now feel bad asking him to make the requested image for me because he is working hard making yours. I hope that you were having as much trouble as I was creating such a 'mosaic', in which case, I hope you get you get what you wanted, because I never will.

Autism is that you?

fucking fag

order up desu
i think that you're just adorable and will gladly do one for you as well. just give me the names~~

V.nice, but you should red pill yourself with Husserl and ditch Memedegger

No I do not suffer from autism.

Thank you I hope I am not taking too much time out of your schedule.

I would say that my top nine are

Nietzsche
David Foster Wallace
David Hume
Richard Feynman
John Locke
John Stewart Mill
Noam Chomsky
Hayek
Milton Friedman

I apologize in advance if you in any way disagree with my choice, these are simply the people that influenced me the most and not necessarily the people who I agree with the most.

Thank you also in case I don't have time to than you for the 'mosaic' in advance.

what a pleasant person you are ;__;

...

Borges, Girard, Lavelle, Calvino, Kierkegaard, Nabokov, Dostoevsky, Don Delillo, Julián Marías

Not exactly my kind of Christfaggotry, but I'd approve it, sure.

Honestly pretty good. Just try not to go insane.

You've never even read Zhuangzi.

Everyone you know thinks you're insufferable to talk to.

You've got no reading comprehension and you think that's impressive somehow.

>Chomsky

>Hayek
>Friedman

mfw interpreting what thinkers mean to posters based on the position in the square they choose for them and what picture they use

Lmaoing @ all the pseuds ITT.

Patrician taste coming through.

How are Deleuze and Sloterdjik compatible?

Who bottom left

Celine

Nobody is talking about compatibility here mate

>Jesus AND Evola

you meme more than you read i see

Whose the guy on the middle left though? I keep seeing him everywhere

Looks like you need a

speedy summary

I guess you have some sort of esquizofrenic thought-structure then.

drop the existentialism kiddos

>soren "organised religion a shit" kierkegaard
>catholicism

>civilization and agriculture was a mistake

what are you going to do about it, little boi?

late jacques camatte is right up your alley

lost me at hannah arendt

muh degeneracy

>state interventionism is why i have no gf

Oh no, I thought this was a joke thread when I first saw this.

This whole cancer of defining oneself by a 3x3 chart of recently read authors and seeking approval from other people desperate enough to do the same hasn't actually traversed from /mu/ to Veeky Forums, has it? Please tell me this thread is ironic

>Everyone you know thinks you're insufferable to talk to.

>implying I show my powerlevel

I don't take Deleuze or Sloterdijk as all-knowing thought-structuring entities, mate. I don't need to agree with everything they say or believe in the consistency of the systems they come up with to be influenced by them.
Also, why bring up Deleuze and Sloterdijk in detriment of any other couple that can be formed by the guys in the picture? Are Quine and Camus any more compatible? Is there any remote compatibility between De Maistre and Pessoa?

...

De Maistre and Pessoa are way more compatible than you'd expect.