Is analytic philosophy respectable?

Of course.

On many topics are many different opinions but logically only one of them can be true. Therefore, philosophy is currently a pseudo-science.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajñana#On_knowledge

Small correction. I meant protoscience and not psuedoscience.

>Philosophy isn't axiomatic

Never heard of Aristotelian logic have you?

freshman engineer detected

>despite the fact that OP specified analytical philosophy people are assuming he means touchy feely no rigor relative philosophy

>continental philosophy

Yes

There is no clear division between continental and analytic, it's just tribalist and sectarian fiction. Also, most philosophy amounts to obfuscated language games that offer nothing except for maybe, the challenge of grasping such a behemoth of faux-complexity. These two poorly-defined groupings in and of themselves display this common reluctance of actually saying anything.

t. someone who knows nothing of analytic philosophy. It is rigorous.