Can we go back to causing global warming at a rampant rate...

Can we go back to causing global warming at a rampant rate? It's gotten down to 36 degrees here the last few nights and it really sucks ass

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luntz#Global_warming
skepticalscience.com/co2-temperature-correlation-intermediate.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Global warming doesn't mean less snow, it means more violent snow, thundersnow even. Maybe someday snownadoes and snowwicanes.

>more violent snow, thundersnow even. Maybe someday snownadoes

how about some snowmunists, North Snowrea, snowcentration camps, and the Snowlocaust.

>global
>here

idiot

Global warming isn't the correct term for it anymore. It's climate change, for a reason. The entire earth isn't getting warmer as some places are having unnatural weather patterns due to many different factors, which may make the average temperature lower in that area.

Snowcanos

>Global warming isn't the correct term for it anymore
It never was. It was horseshit all along.

It was a good slogan. It fear mongered plenty of people into "oh god, save the overheating polar bears!" Then when actual climatologists started looking at it, they said "The earth is getting warmer on average, but that doesn't mean the entire earth is heating up." That's the problem with averages. Most people aren't smart enough to understand how outliers effect an average. So even though the outliers were starting to stretch further in both directions, people like Al Gore took it and ran with the fact that most idiots don't understand averages to push it saying "See! The average is going up! The earth is over heating!" It's a good way to drum up money I suppose. It's still a thing though, it's pretty obvious to anyone who has been alive for more than 10 years that the climate is changing.

Oh go fuck yourself.

Climate Change doesn't have the word 'Global' in it. It describes local volatility.

Global Warming is a fact, it describes the Global(duh) average.

You're one of those idiots that doesn't understand averages I see. Instead of looking at the average, a more accurate way would be to look at the mode of the data, as that would give you the number that is repeated the most. Global warming isn't a fact, because that would mean the globe (every single place) would be warming up. That's factually not true. There are plenty of places in the world that are seeing a downward shift in temperature due to weather patterns (which is part of climate).

Global Warming is a Chinese hoax... and the rising sea water temperature, are all figments of the sick imagination of unpatriotic liberal scum...! Worse...socialist liberal scum!
A lot of good people are unmasking this treachery in the current US administration, in the churches of Texas, everywhere...Hallelujah...

Global warming is fake. Climate change is not.

>Global warming isn't a fact
sure bud

That's climate change. For global warming to happen. This whole globe has to be warming, which isn't true. What you showed were averages, which misrepresents the real story. Let me break it down.
Let's say New York is 10° warmer on average than 10 years ago. Due to New York being 10° warmer it would change the climate (ocean currents, how much snow they get etc.) Because things like ocean currents are effected, that changes the weather elsewhere in the world (the current may Now be colder/warmer, move faster, shift to other areas etc.) Because our weather is largely dictated by the ocean and it's currents, this change in the currents could cause different weather patterns in other places of the world (Cuba now gets more rain, meaning the average temperature would be slightly lower due to not getting as much indirect sunlight, etc.) But, it's still pretty warm, so it might only shift the average temperature down by 2° as compared to New York's 10°. As far as average is concerned, the globe has now increased its temperature by a factor of 6 (((10+2)/2)=6). Oh no! Our average global temperature is rising! But Cuba is now colder, so the entire globe isn't warming up, because that's not how averages work. That's the difference in global warming and climate change. Now that you're educated and provided with a simple example, you too can use this simple example, using simple math; to educate all of your uneducated peers who believe global warming is real.

>muh global warming vs climate change

Both terms are correct and have been used by scientists for decades. However, it was actually Frank Lutz, a republican advisor, who decided to have the term climate change used publically

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luntz#Global_warming

>Although Luntz later tried to distance himself from the Bush administration policy, it was his idea that administration communications reframe "global warming" as "climate change" since "climate change" was thought to sound less severe.

They're called cryovolcanoes.

>Snowlocaust
Oy vey! remember all the 6 gorillions of Africans that died during the great snownado!

>posts a chart of his mom's distended butt over time

Pssh. Nothin personnel, kid.

Hey nice graph. Really made me think. Pic unrelated

>made me think
you lied before, and you lie now

>t. idiot

global warming is an average

Yeah. That's what I said. I didnt say it wasn't an average.
See
I've been equating global warming as an average this entire time. I simply said the average doesn't show the entire picture and is only used to fear monger a reaction ie Al gore. The average doesn't help us in any way shape or form, because the average doesn't show what is actually going on just "OMG THE WORLD IS GETTING HOTTER AND POLAR BEARS ARE DROWNING. GIVE ME MONEY." Please make sure you follow a comment thread all the way up before you post stupid shit. Thanks.

>average doesn't show what is actually going on
what a load of crap

Good argument.

FUCK OFF. ITS ALMOST KOVEMBER AND THERE'S STILL NO SNOW. IN CANADA IT'S FUCKING 26 OUT

even better
skepticalscience.com/co2-temperature-correlation-intermediate.htm

Great, there's no link between C02 and temperature increase. What's your point?

>he can't read

top kek

No, I read it. I just don't know what it has to do with with what we were discussing. The earth's climate changes all the time. That's a fact, it always has and always will. But it's not global warming, it's climate change.

>there's no link between C02 and temperature increase

this proves you didn't read it

Shut up science bitch

Yeah, I miss typed. Of course C02 affects that. Livestock C02 is one of our biggest problems. I agree with that. It still doesn't change the fact it's climate change and not global warming. You have still yet to refute literally anything I've said. Just name calling and some C02 article. You're factually useless.

>Stop with all these facts, they make me understand.

>Livestock C02 is one of our biggest problems
retard
livestock co2 is irrelevant

the only relevant co2 is that which results from permanent deforestation, and that which results from fossil fuels. everything else is just part of the carbon cycle one way or another.

>livestock co2 is irrelevant
Not that guy, but it's pretty clear you're just arguing to argue at this point, because you keep making these statements, but no where do you back your statements up with any sort of numbers or sources, or even logic based in reality. First off
>everything else is just part of the carbon cycle
So what about cars? Those are not part of the carbon cycle.
Second. There are studies on this. Livestock are responsible for 18% of the world's entire greenhouse gas emissions. That's more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together. How can you say that's not relevant? It's almost 1/5 of the entire production and it's not relevant? You're actually stupid my friend. The worst part about it, is the fact that you're stupid but seem to take your stupid uninformed opinion and push them as facts. Then, when you get called out on your stupidity; you switch the subject and continue to spout more stupid uninformed opinions, except now you're just deflecting. Except, you don't actually know how stupid you sound.