Does entropy defy Darwinism?

And the all the Empirical data pertaining to subatomic phenomena has done nothing to change that? I don't mean to be sardonic but, besides admitting that "dark" and "anti" aspects of things are integral to the Mathematical map of Matter and thus the world itself, so much so as to easily qualify as archetypal or proverbial Others (spirit worlds, dreamtime, etc.), something which is Scientific anathema, you're also admitting that this is so for no reason other than self-sustaining dogma, the other big anathema in Science.

Just stop. He's not going to listen. Even with the plethora of answers in this thread, he's going to put his fingers in his ears and continue with his answers in Genesis tier of "bias" rather than actually listening.

By your admission, the idea of thermodynamics was created on the assumption that the smallest particles observable were fundamental. If you maintain that subsequent phenomena, such as subatomic ones, do nothing to invalidate thermodynamics then I can maintain that atomic phenomena and the idea of thermodynamics do nothing to invalidate preceding ideas, such as classical elements.

Life unavoidably creates entropy. Even though small localized bubbles can maintain homeostasis, the area around them becomes more entropic. Life is the universal equivalent of paying off you credit card debt with a high interest loan. You haven't gotten out of debt, you've just moved it and increased it. Same thing with life. Since even a single cell would end up making the universe more entropic than when it found it, thermodynamics mean that the universe will tend towrards cells existing.

But they simply don't.
It's like saying rocks on the fucking beach change the notion of planetary mechanics.
Or saying that electromagnetism invalidates gravity.
Why am i even arguing with you? This needs to stop now.
Go read a bloody book for once in your life.

>they simply don't - Science 2017

Speaking of books and fingers in ears, what's your take on Biosemiotics?

Not that guy but no.
You have a disease called Platonism.

Not to get into how fucked up your mind is but thermodynamics is a scale invariant observation.
Thermodynamics and its statistical mechanics brother does not fail depending on the scale of its objects because the theory takes place in a positive space: the point where heat death takes over is not the point where there is no energy, but when there is no difference in energy.
There is no negative entropy to counter entropy only a conservation of energy that is taken to be neither created nor destroyed.

The burden of evidence for claiming that the existence of subatomic particles invalidates the laws of thermodynamics is on you.

...

Classical elements are scale invariant too. Since God's creation is an expression of Him, the smallest scale operates by the same basic interplay of elements through which He manifests everything.