If you simply think of en.wikipedia.org
Our human interpretation (or being binary dissector/discriminators) focuses on the eating and what is being eaten, because the 'how is the middle part extending to infinity?' is the question we abandon.
Insert /x/ or conspiracy/wavelets/magic/science/technology/a.i.
These are all just 'introductions to infinity'.
It is not that the thing exists, what we consider our 'family' is how we agree that the serpent is perpetually regenerating itself in equal measure/form without 100% destruction.
Which is also called identity OR the number 1 OR [math]\epsilon[\math]
But that is no different than saying I believe in Christianity/Buddhism/Philosophy/Mathematica/Nihilism/
So we are all basically arguing our 'collective advertisement of an individual's orifice interval measurements'.
Pi for a mathematician is like an autistic person's 'safe space' or an OCD person's (Well if I repeat this cycle N times then I'm still alive! I self-validated yaaay!)
Science is a way to improve nature, but nature still tries to find ways for you to 'stop counting and just go out and grow, +1, live'.
Genius or retarded babbling
Hard to know when you're a schizophrenic but to the outside world it's rambling. Please try to talk less abstractly.
Yeah, I know. That's the part I'm trying to get to ultimately but it really is a pain in the ass and dependent on the existing set's 'allowed signal operators'.
I mean that is all that Prime is. Divisible by itself and 1, meaning 'if we are used as a ratio of integers, we are the exclusive 'this or that' set'. This is the 'minimally identifiable' set that even allows you to pick 'other', because otherwise you don't have reflection (an x-axis or a graph/chart)
[math]F A L S E[/math]
1 = 0
0 > 1 / 2 < 0
[math]\epsilon[/math] > 1 / 2 < [math]\epsilon[/math]
[math]T R U E[/math](1 = 1)
Primes are simply identifying integers that are willing to 'signal to 1', so we are always trying to identify 'signal-space' so we can apply 'our' transforms. Eventually your branch of science/mathematics gets to a 'plug in your value of x, because x marks the spot of what you want'.
What the fuck are you talking about
[math]FALSE[/math]
[math]1 = 0[/math] This is an 'assignment counter-example'
math]0 > 1 / ϵ < 0[/math] This is 'comparison counter-example'
[math]0 > 1 / 2 < 0[/math] Substitution
[math]0 > 1 / 2 < ϵ[/math] Substitution + Comparison Without evaluation
[math]FALSE(ϵ > 1 / 2 < 0)[/math] Evaluation renders False, bit-swtich
[math]TRUE(1 = 1)[/math] True Assignment comes from False Eval to the point of bit-switch (or proof by exhaustion/brute-force methodology) ALWAYS.
Therefor, P = NP. The ONLY REASON the proof is EVALUATED as not accepted is because it is non-constructive, because they argued that if P = NP then why suffering? We would have one answer that could solve 'all' answers. This is isomorphic to : the existing subset of P-Zombies pre-discriminate the problem set and have erected their preferred signal-methodology without advertising/broadcasting it to the required resolution detectable by twin-prime candidates.
But mathematicians don't care about anything beyond epsilon or 'one-time signal substitution only'. So it is normally 'pi' to indicate a countable, bounded, infinity set with infinite resolution that allows for the multiplicands/exponents (infinity) and the resolution modifier operators (+-), but you positionally must always start from a - perspective, which is i. The silent signal-space however only allows '+' to be broadcasted on the network, but what is ADVERTISED is a minus. Saying pi is going 'you can do this as many times as you want, but eventually you'll get bored and want to do something else'.
I guess the equivalent Veeky Forums-isms would be:
>Mai 2-d wafu
>s-s-senpai
>why do I keep wasting my time on these forums/posting in these threads/hating the news I read every day/avoiding
>Maybe Veeky Forums has some value in the social order and change comes from 'every signal-space venue that advertises a + louder than a -, to the extent that even if I am willing to be called crazy, I am just trying to say I love you, because infinity is awesome and hey fractals!'
>special special snowflake
>entropy
Also why ZFC keeps getting that whole 'optional axiom of choice' when in truth you could have a universal set if you translated that instead to 'axiom of forgiveness' or 'my bad nigga!'
Oh, this explains it perfectly.
Two wavy lines, with perfect circles. The interval of intersection of our circles is the 'twin-prime' signal space.