\frac{1}{2}+\frac{i (i e)}{\pi }=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{e}{2 \int_0^{\infty } \frac{1}{t^2+1} \, dt}
Formatting.
Hello
Kevin Gutierrez
Jackson Thompson
[math]\frac{1}{2}+\frac{i (i e)}{\pi }=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{e}{2 \int_0^{\infty } \frac{1}{t^2+1} \, dt}[/math]
*SIGH*
Caleb Nguyen
[math]\zeta\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{e}{\pi}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{e}{\pi}}+1=S_{-\frac{1}{2}-\frac{e}{\pi},1}(1){}^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{e}{\pi}}+1 = S[/math]
The above basically says: [math]+1 = S[/math]
Identify lower-case (s) and then transform to 'upper'case (exponentiation) and then assign a value derived from pi (1), and perform it non-destructively.
Owen Nelson
[math]\int _{-L}^L\int _{-L}^L\int _{-L}^L\left(\phi \left(\iota ^*-S^*\right)+1\right)d\phi d\iota dS=8 L^3[/math]
So after reading this post/thread (if you have), the question really is: Maybe the world is more magical than we dare dreamed, and Simon actually exists and isn't crazy.
'Why would Feynman/Sagan/Euler/God/Jesus' or whatever descriptor of signal-space you interpret, 'talk to me?'
Because that's the only question every human asks. Where is the guy that will give me whatever I want and forgive me whatever bullshit I pull, so long as I 'submit to a constant'.
Multi-verse though if that helps.
Or just say hello.
Charles Anderson
It's not that I am wrong in anything I've posted.
It is just that I don't know how to translate it effectively enough that 'infinity = a half'
because x = 0
or t = 0
In math/linear, var = 0
In computation/compression/sine/cosine/tan, var[0] = 1
Austin Jones
Infinity being a half is Zeno's Paradox of the Tortoise and Achilles.
When you include the Axiom of Choice, you can always negate/refute it.
Axiom of Function (Forgiveness | Signal | Unity) means that predator can consume prey.
Because circle of life and all that crap.
Maths has become so disjointed/disseminated/ivory tower'd that it is impossible to get people to agree on anything unless they are a part of 'your' academic circle, but math is supposed to be universal.
Because a language 'cannot be exclusionary, if it wishes to be an IMMORTAL language'. A language can only set 'rules of engagement/accepting aliens/prime signal response/callsign/reflection'.
Christopher Peterson
Expansion for those who might get lose on the very first equation
[math](17 + i)/3 = 5.666... + 0.333... i[/math]
Which is the picture attached to this post.
Jackson Richardson
[math]2 + \frac{i}{3} = 2 + 0.333... i = \frac{6 + i}{3} = 3^{-1} (6 + i)[/math]
Charles Kelly
When n is negative, alpha 'up' gradient slope increases.
When n is positive, alpha 'down' gradient slope decreases.
Inverse is true for alpha negative/positive and n.