Why is the genetic basis for the intellectual disparity between races so taboo?
It's like, you can talk about every confirmed fact that would lead up to the difference but then when you make the blatantly obvious conclusion, you're just a racist piece of shit
A population left northern African 60,000 years ago
That population ran into and interbred with another hominid sub-species which had a higher cranial capacity
Outbreeding drives heterosis (hybrid vigor) and typically makes for a stouter offspring
That population benefited from it and now has a larger cranial capacity than the humans left behind in Africa
Oh did I mention those are whites and asians and the ones left behind are black? OHMYGODYOURACISTFUCKHITLERNAZISCUME
>Oh did I mention those are whites and asians and the ones left behind are black? OHMYGODYOURACISTFUCKHITLERNAZISCUME >Why is the genetic basis for the intellectual disparity between races so taboo?
This makes no sense. Science is dominated by white people, and according to you it is white people who are genetically favored. Hmm... why would white people make this taboo? They have no incentive to do that. This makes no sense.
I think the explanation is that it goes the other way around. White people are the inferior ones and that is why white people made racial research taboo. Now that we have established that, what should be the preferred method to genocide the inferior white monkeys?
Logan Barnes
Go watch your wife being pounded by a black man you cuck
Carter Rivera
>a determinate /pol/, determinate is not a noun. Also, there is no scientific evidence regarding intelligence because it's a subjective matter.
Owen Kelly
we have these threads every day and every day you get shat on why dou you still come here
Asher Baker
Determinant is, and that was the word used
Mason Phillips
>population ran into and interbred with other hominid species.
Neanderthals were who early homosapiens could possibly have interbred with. However Neanderthals were far dumber than us and it has been said that Neanderthal genetics could be responsible for dyslexia. /pol/ can go fuck itself.
Christian Reed
Sorry, misread. Determinant in that context is still wrong though. Even one outlier would be enough to disprove it. They correlate but you'd need perfect causation to have a determinant.
Brody Lee
>(((White people))) made this into taboo. Let me just move this conversation ahead a bit. It is not a problem if one says that Ashkenazy Jews are more intelligent than anybody else. The problem is only if you say that whites are in any way better. I bet I could get a paper published that states that blacks have higher IQ than whites.
Jayden Jackson
Do you know Cosmas Indicopleustes? He was a medieval traveller, one of the best of his time. He travelled from Europe to India, and traced maps of his discoveries, which are strangely accurate (pic related). He believed the earth was flat because he was a devoted christian. Even though he knew a lot of things about the earth and travelled way more than most of us will ever do, he still believed the earth was flat, simply because his ideology (or religion) shaped the way he saw the world. The bible said the earth was flat, so it had to be, and everyone agreed with him, except some evil pagan satanist. There were pagan philosophers who imagined the earth as a sphere and the universe as a boundless space. Obviously they had this opinion not only due to empirical proofs but also due to ideological constrictions, but they were right, weren't they? Still, during most of the dark ages, nobody believed them. We are costantly told since we are born that there is only one race, the human race. It causes us a strong emotional response even after knowing that this isn't the truth, simply because it shaped our worldview since we were born. This has nothing to do with being smart, brainlets, wise or ignorant. This has all to do with effort, or luck, if you want, to be able to raise up from this particular cavern
