how come when high IQ people see the design, beauty and contingency in the universe they logically realize that a transcendent designer is responsible for crafting order out of chaos?
While brainlets look at the same universe and plug their ears, close their eyes and just attribute it to blind randomness or pretend like it was always the case, by default?
How come when high IQ people see the design...
William Perez
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Liam Reyes
>how come I claim that smart people believe my retarded opinion while dumb ones believe the opposite?
I'm not sure. Cognitive bias on your part, perhaps?
Parker Harris
>brainlet can't distinguish the relative from the absolute
Blake Morris
Yes clearly it takes more intelligence to follow your intuition's first guess than to figure out how order could arise from randomness. I am enlightened by my own intuition.
Luis Hughes
>order arising out of randomness
no such thing as randomness. see causality.
the matter and space are impotent without intelligence and purpose weaving them into order.
the universe has a beginning.
Brody Young
laplace`s demon you nigger
Gavin Campbell
>no such thing as randomness.
Disorder, non-intelligence, whatever you like. Yes of course it exists, it's all around you. Is an atom intelligent? Is a rock intelligent? Break down intelligence into peices and you have nothing intelligent.
>the matter and space are impotent
Sorry, but this has been proven false again and again by scientific investigation. We know how order spontaneously arises. To say muh godidit and claim is more intelligent is absurd. It takes literally no intellectual effort to say godidit at everything and anything. You have obtained nothing about the world, you pathetic blind fool.
Adrian Bennett
>Disorder, non-intelligence, whatever you like. Yes of course it exists, it's all around you. Is an atom intelligent? Is a rock intelligent? Break down intelligence into peices and you have nothing intelligent.
By that same token life does not excist. Or colour, sound. Even pressure would not exist according to your method.
Brayden Ortiz
>By that same token life does not excist.
No it doesn't moron. There are things which are clearly alive and things which are clearly not. The former is made up of the latter. These are basic facts of reality, you delusional quack.
Wyatt Cook
So atoms have life? We have life, our cells are alive, are our atoms alive?