He thinks 1 x 1 = 1

Makes sense

>He thinks
x may well be defined as a function over the natural numbers like this:
x: N2 → N : (a,b) = a⋅b

Then the logical evaluation is:
n_1, n_2, n_3,... ∈ N
Let □ : N^k → N
Let:
φ □ ψ = □(φ,ψ)
□φ = □(φ)

So:
1 x 1 x 1 = x(1,1) x 1 = x(1⋅1,1) = 1⋅1⋅1

...

Terrence?

What if 1-1=1?

I think this guy is confusing multiplication with addition.

For anybody looking for the genius who finally realize 1x1=2.

independent.co.uk/news/people/terrence-howard-thinks-1x1-2-has-a-secret-system-called-terryology-and-spends-17-hours-a-day-making-10502365.html

>square root of 2 equals 2
How the fuck did this guy even get into college?

Ah I see now.

If there's a class of 20 students, and 100% of students passed the midterm, and 100% of students passed the final, then there must be 20 extra students who did the final for the people in the class.

so what number times 1 equals 1 in this system?

>It is a false axiom
Stopped reading there.

Delete your thread OP.

>Do one thing
>Do It once
>Apparently you've done twice the work you thought you did.
>Only expend enough energy for having done it one time

Whew boy

1x1=2
But you can't the other 1 because is a dark number.

...

To make up for this, just add a hypothetical dark number.