Gender isn't a social construct

OP here. Honestly I tried to post this on /pol/ first but I'm banned from /pol/ so I thought I'd post it here.

/pol/ is trying to stir up gender shit to divide people on /lgbt/ too.

>- Sports and working on cars are male interests, cooking and sewing are female interests
I do think that's true though. Males evolved to be more competitive and are physically stronger and faster than women. Couple that to the fact that men also tend to be more logical and strategical than females (again because of evolution) and we see why they would naturally be more attracted to sports.
>Some of gender, like males being better adapted to hunting and women being better adapted to childcare has actual basis
Well if some of gender has actual basis then that's enough to counter your original claim that gender doesn't exist...?

>Gender is used by society to create an image of what is expected and valued.
Exactly what gender is, it is a social construct. Gender use and it itself are the same.

I see you didn't finish reading that sentence.

Are you doubting right wing scientific research that proves Women have evolved to have genes specifically for Hello Kitty?

Please stop. If you want to talk about chromosome sequencing and how it affects neurological development, then please do so. However this thread as it is, has nothing to do with science or math

so what i actually mean is DELETE THIS

Actual dad here:

If you are born a boy you're going to have testosterone in your system, your body is going to develop as a man, if you are girl you'll have estrogen and your body will develop as woman. That is nature and has nothing to do with social construct.

Let's say that you go for hormone therapy at an early age and you become a passable trap / have reassigning sex surgery, your body still won't be capable of fulfilling its natural function, that is for male to impregnate, and for a woman to have babies. That is nature, not a social construct.

Everything else that you claimed, behavior, habits, traits, listen to some specific music, etc., is how society divides the genders, not because of whim, but because what is desirable is for the individual to fulfill its natural role, not a constructed one, the social construct is for the identification and interaction with the individual.

Science has its limits, but if one day men can have babies and women can impregnate themselves that, my friend, would be a social construct, exactly what you are criticizing here.

How does painting a girl's room pink and a boy's room blue facilitate them having sex when they become of age?

Yes I did. You still claimed that there is at least some actual basis to gender theory even though most of it is false. How do you reconciliate both claims? Does gender exist based on these actual facts rooted in biology that you mentioned or not? If not, why? Try not to dodge the question this time.