Is this sustainable?
Is this sustainable?
Adrian Morgan
Christopher Bennett
Nope, and nobody's getting on my land when push comes to shove.
Michael Martin
It seems to be leveling out. 12 billion is certainly sustainable as far as basic living needs are concerned (food, a place to live, clean water). Anyway the environment isn't being destroyed by too many people, it's being destroyed by a small fraction of people with lots of money.
Juan Mitchell
>Anyway the environment isn't being destroyed by too many people, it's being destroyed by a small fraction of people with lots of money.
Yeah, no.
Poor people breed more kids, more kids =more co2, more waste, more acidification of the ocean, etc;
We know rich fucks fuck the environment, but there are more poor and poorer (in relation to the wealthy) people out there, (such as the middle class). What with cars, homes, etc; meat agriculture pumping out CO2 etc;
12 billion is certainly not sustainable, especially when the sea levels rise and it forces mass migration of peoples, especially from different cultures which will inevitable cause massive conflicts.
David Johnson
11.2B in 2100 would be a severe drop-off from the rate of the last century. Easily sustainable.
Jackson Flores
Similar thoughts here...
Grayson Williams
Just know war doesn't work well. Example last century.
Indirect control mechanisms required.
Liam Baker
You could just Google how much CO2 a third-worlder produces compared to a first-worlder. It's way way less.
Jaxon Brooks
Check out Saudi arabia 2030 plan. Does anyone think the peasants will be allowed in?
China already partions it's population.
Prepare for mass human migrations. Whether from war, economic, environmental, or other, it's coming to a theater near you. Enjoy what left of the good ol days.
Kayden Collins
This user gets it.