Tfw you round gravity to 10 and pi to 3 in the same equation

>tfw you round gravity to 9.8067 and pi to 3.14159 in the same equation.

>be me
>almost always alone, too much of an autist and liking to build shit is not much of a turn on these days
>engineering undergrad, trying to get experience in chem.eng by finding shitty people to do shitty work for
>meet this great girl on campus during a conference, 7/10, does civil eng.
>first few weeks, all is going great, we go out on two dates
>out of nowhere "user, I'm going back to UK, I dont think we will be able to meet much more"
>tfw back to having no qt 3 engineering gf

3.14**** REEEEEEEEEEE

found the 'science fan'

qt 3 engineering gf
OP is a faggot

Why would you round anything instead of just writing [math] \pi g [/math] and plugging it into a calculator when needed?

>doing EE
>"eh fuck calculating the operating point of this amp"
>"i'll just use some 1k resistors here and a 680 here..."
>mfw it works perfectly

FUCKING ENGINEERS!

>Rounding anything ever and not writing out thousands of decimal places by hand over a couple of hours each time you write any number to maintain perfect accuracy

>tfw you correctly propagate uncertainty and explicitly include error estimates, as well as a large discussion of error sources
>tfw media removes all of this and further entrenches science denialism

Looks like Andrew dice clay

22/7 is disgusting. "The first three digits are the same so we should use this."
It's as far from pi as 3.14. Just seems like a pretentious way to add more digits.

If you don't have at least 30 digits of pi memorized, you are not worthy of posting on Veeky Forums.

t. virgin till death

there is literally no point to memorizing more than 7 digits of pi

>not rounding pi to sqrt(2) + sqrt(3)

>not rounding pi to sqrt(7+sqrt(6+sqrt(5)))