>>9299085

>changing the meaning of equals when you feel like it isn't postmodern, critical theoretic, sjw nonsense.

The sum of all positive integers doesn't equal a real number you fucking brainlet.

the only way it would is if it converged, which it does not.

now fuck off.

If you want to actually do something productive an rigorous then come up with another word or symbol for the relation you want to express between -1/12 and the sum of all natural numbers. You can call it "magic equals" if you want. you can use the symbol ~> if you want.

But stop being a subversive little shitter spreading fallacies and disinformation claiming that 1 + 2 + 3 + ... = -1/12 because that is a patent fucking falsehood.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=w-I6XTVZXww.
youtu.be/sD0NjbwqlYw
algo.inria.fr/seminars/sem01-02/delabaere2.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

kek

>missing subtleties this hard.

I guess you can't expect much out of someone who makes a thread just to reply to a dead post.

>no argument

kill yourself, brainlet

>I don't know complex analysis but here's my opinion on math
ok then

this has nothing to do with the notion of equals you fucking brainlet. of course its true that 1 + 2 + 3 + ... does not equal -1/12 in a naive formulation like other brainlets like to spew, but using complex analysis it isn't hard to make such a rigorous formulation. come back when you graduate highschool

OP you seem really passionate about this whole -1/12 thing. Watch this video: youtube.com/watch?v=w-I6XTVZXww. I think you'll like it.

I fucking hate this meme.

Ok user, give me the "correct" definition of equals then.

i disagree because you are racist