, there has been a recent development which is potentially very interesting. The modified gravity hypothesis did not only predict a naturally-flat universe, but it also predicted a modification to the structure of black holes. The hypothesis eliminated the troublesome singularities which are supposed to lie at the heart of black holes. Instead, the hypothesis predicted that the mass of a black hole would be concentrated at its event horizon. In August 2016, a team led by Vitor Cardoso of the Superior Technical Institute in Lisbon suggested that the signature of a thickened event horizon could be detected in the recently-discovered gravitational wave signals. The gravitational waves were produced by the merging of two black holes, producing a staggering amount of energy. This prediction was investigated by a team led by Niyayesh Afshordi of the Perimeter Institute and the University of Waterloo.
In December 2016, Afshordi's team released a paper with the evocative title of "Echoes from the Abyss", in which they announced that they had detected echoes of energy released between the inner layer of the event horizon and the outer layer of the event horizon. This would appear to indicate some structure at the event horizon, structure which was not predicted by conventional general relativity. The announcement was also featured in an article in Nature magazine which was aimed at the general readership.
No singularities at center of black holes
The sad part about the fields of science is that you retards literally have to prove what any normie can and already has figured.
literally last place in every race. Scientific News is an oxymoron.
Like what?
t. literal retard
Einstein was wrong and you have to spend decades proving it instead of just saying "he's wrong" and leaving it at that.
What the fuck about the event horizon ever would have suggested it would exist as anything other than a surface.
like damn put the shit together, thanks for joining the rest of us in common sense logical thinking.
t. literal retard
>"y-you retard"
uw0t?
t. literal retard
>t. literally always believed the idea of the singularity
You're like a child who just found out santa claus isn't real.
t. literal retard
Keep it up shitter.
t. literal retard
>t. i literally not even figuratively believed some fucking geriatric kike retard's predictions about shit he didn't know wtf he was even talking about and am immensely booty blasted over the granted fact that volumes have surfaces
You're a feckless human being and I am not going to argue with a dunning-kruger tier plebian.
t. literal retard
...
We know that the force of gravity split to become a distinct force in just a fraction of a second after the Big Bang. If there was a force of gravity at that point in time, then there must also havebeen a law of gravity. And, as we know the laws of physics do not change with time, that law of gravity must have been the same as it is now: Newton's law of gravity must have come into existence 10-43 seconds after the Big Bang.
average temperature of the universe now at merely a couple of degrees kelvin, the kinetic energy of particles currently forms a negligible part of their total energy. Which brings us to the next crucial point. Mass and energy can be considered to be the "charge" of gravity: the more mass and energy a particle has, the more it feels the force of gravity. So the cooling of the universe — and the corresponding reduction in energy — has implications for gravitational charge
define gravity
Gravity is a force of attraction that exists between any two masses, any two bodies, any two particles. Gravity is not just the attraction between objects and the Earth. It is an attraction that exists between all objects, everywhere in the universe.
Yeah but how does it work
>Yeah but how does it work
Only theories,not known.
Just one part of universe that makes it all work.
literally this: how can GR brainlets believe in a singlularity?
...
Everything that has mass bends spacetime. That bending of spacetime is gravity, but we don't know why mass bends spacetime.
Mass is Chad.
>And, as we know the laws of physics do not change with time
Biggest assumption of physics (which makes it easier to theorize), and most likely to be wrong imo.
strap on
Spacetime is the most fundamental entity. When its geometry is locally deformed, it interacts with other fields to induce the existence of an object with mass or energy that matches the deformation. Waves in sapecetime act as pilot waves and guide the induced objects that we see, and not the opposite.
>Spacetime is the most fundamental entity
So you claim but how can you prove such a thing?
because we don't know why mass bends spacetime.
It's easier to assume spactime curvature actually pilots the distribution of mass.
Newtonian faggot detected