Women age quick whereas men are constantly face to face with eternity I.E. Don't worry about what women think...

Who cares? You're not supposed to have sex before marriage anyway.

Why do you guys seek this shit out if it triggers you so much?

it's like picking a scab

>Angela Nagle is the author of the forthcoming book Kill All Normies: From Veeky Forums and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right

wow

Do normal people really give a shit about what goes on online on sites like these?
All she is gonna get as readers are worried parents , faggots like you who want to get pissed at some stacey missing the point again or simply acknowledging you and her mom who reads all the shit her little girl spews out.
Even if you try to make it irl with shootings and bullying losers into suicide No One Fucking Cares!

>Hey everyone, bully the losers more!

It's just high school shit with more artifice to it.

>normie woman who got through college off of unpaid student loans and her parent's generosity calls men betas
>is a beta women herself
>probably been cheated on multiple times
>has unhealthy looking hair, low Estrogen physigonomy
>in general isn't aesthetically appealing
>thinks talking down to above average iq men is worth her time
they just keep digging a deeper hole

>boring
>unfun
Former normie turned /r9k/ poster and current autist here. You guys are mostly spot-on except for those two points. The normie standards of interesting and fun aren't really things to strive for. Fun and interesting are interchangeable to pure breed normalfaggots with the exception being that a normie will call a hobby interesting if a person they are attracted too engages in it even if the normie does not think that that hobby is fun. Being called interesting by a normie is often not a judgement of you but a judgement of what you have done or how attractive you are if the person calling you interesting is a woman. If a normie calls you boring, it's because the things you do would not make that normie feel good. Being called fun is nearly identical, but can be more genuine.

Basically a normalfag's judgement is based in how they experience a person as opposed being an attempt to describe how that person actually is

The Virgin is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a weeb, NEET, faggot, retard, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Virgin and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

Did you tards even read the article?

>It's another "dumb bitch goes on Veeky Forums and can't tell the difference between sincerity and satire episode."

I dunno man. being a weird naive loser has always gotten me laid. some women are way into it.

This man knows.

having a tinder and looking through the endless sea of vapid, borderline mentally retarded women with unreasonably high standards is both extremely funny and yet deeply depressing

context hasn't mattered since the 20th century, shrimp

The modern female is immunized against all dangers: one may call her a slut, a bitch or a bitter man hating feminist and it all runs off her like water off a raincoat. But tell her to fix her eyebrows and you will be astonished at how she recoils, how injured she is, how she suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

Yes I did. She's more honest than most journalists and captured nuance better, but only with the intent of framing nerds as being merely a different kind of sexist.

>movies, music, reading
Movies and music are probably the two most popular hobbies on earth. Not only that but you literally cannot play sports every night. You body will be destroyed. What on earth are you meant to do?

Veeky Forums is full of sexism. you're not being a dishonest hypocrite now are you?

>a woman deciding who is a "real" man

Just no.

Only men can define what it means to be a man.

chat with your friends and have sex you weirdo virgin

Kek

What if I'm ugly

It is, but she ends the piece with a portrayal of the two dominant internet subcultures as being inherently binary after calling out that very binary fashion of thinking by labeling all critics of women as part of the same patriarchy.

Sure, there's sexism all throughout Veeky Forums and all of the other imageboards, but it's disappointing to hear someone come full circle through all of the heaps nuance back to a binary conclusion.

where does she say the are apart of the same patriarchy? she only mentions one trend that is old, while the rest is new. sounds like you're forgetting to your reading.

just bee yourself

What if myself just likes to play video games and read

>fucking idiots ITT

Although killing zombies and living with parents are weird, the rest are only mentioned because they are the kind of thing you only write about if you have zero personality. Everybody does these things

It's worse than that, these hateful creatures aren't concerned with your honesty. When a woman tells you "real men" or "real women" are a certain way they are telling you how their idealised version of a person should be, because they can't handle the real world they withdraw to this imaginary land where they get exactly what they want from others. Also
>women telling men how to be men
kek

>slimy holes
I was just thinking about this earlier today. God, if i date another girl with a fucked up vag i'm just gonna go gay. The penis is way better than the pus

is the baffler good

Do you even reading comprehension?

not an argument.

>he likes dry pussy

>It's another normie conflating personalities and hobbies
Reminder that the average "interesting" normie is just a boring person who does a lot of Facebook photo worthy things.

I made it a few paragraphs in, she really doesn't get the joke, it's kinda sad

Listing off random activities is boring as shit

Go into some detail

What kind of books do you like? What films? What music? Why do you have these tastes?

These things are important.

I didn't say that she said that. I said that she criticized mainstream thinkers for lumping the two together as standard old fashioned patriarchy. Christ mang.

right but that dichotomy is the patriarchy, "battle of the sexes". she's not saying Tumblr/Chan is a dichotomy. she's saying.they are cannibalising images of the old but one strain is killing people.

Oh man you have no idea how bad dicks can get.

this basically.

They apply that rule for being female and feminist, so i feel it's only fair we get to do the same.

but /b/ and /pol/'s ideas suck so bad

Memes are like diseases. The overly lethal ones burn themselves out. The really dangerous ones are the ones that don't.

last girl i dated had a nasty pus though.
>meat flaps the size of my testicals but moister and fleshier
>the feel of the other inner membrane, all cold and slimy on my tongue
>looked like dried sploosh from earlier times around the vag and thigh.
>Her wetness was thick, almost like boogers

Gonna make myself sick just thinking about it.

help me out, brother, and enlighten me

I'd be retarded if i let /pol/ or /b/ define what is masculine.

I meant it in a case by case way.
> Men get to define masculinity

> /b/ defines /b/
>/pol/ defines /pol/
>Veeky Forums defines Veeky Forums
>all boards add some identity to Veeky Forums

sure. makes sense. i just don't think repeating the mistakes of the feminist movement is a good idea.

ok, I can see what you're saying.

Guess it's better to be careful to not fall into the precedent they've lain out when it has plenty of flaws by itself.

feminism was a mistake...

so were you.

>your value is derived from these [insert social constructs]
untermensch detected.

>unironically using the word "dysgenic"

>>>/lookism/

I'm well aware of that, but I never asked to be born so I may as well spend my time irritating you.

Angela Nagle if you are reading this please be my gf

And what do you write about if you have a personality?

Angela Nagle here.
Sorry, I don't date beta faggots like you. My pussy is for Chad only ;)

>thinks he's irritating me
>so sad

Angela nagle isn't in the OP guys. She's actually much uglier. OP pic is a QT trolling.

>the people who say that you can decide what biological gender are you complain about some anonymous dude who read books for fun
damn...

If i'm watching traps why u think i'm even interested?

Most men aren't suppose to reproduce. Why berate men for enjoying things like reading? Shouldn't they be happy that they won't have to interact with as many betas?

Geez sperg down a bit
I was specifically talking about things to do at home. If you take away all the things I mentioned I don't know what else I'm supposed to do while there. Next you are going to tell me I should never be at home though. As for the rest of that post, I won't even bother.

>most men aren't supposed to reproduce
no like 33% aren't supposed to reproduce

As much as we all love and admire Elliot Rodger, there is no evidence that he posted here.

i didn't think they really existed...

>Movies and music are probably the two most popular hobbies on earth

That's the point. If you have to list those as hobbies you're probably not very interesting and are just filling up space. You can get away with it if you're more specific (instead of just music, say jazz and classical, or instead of reading say modernist poetry and Elizabethan drama), but just movies or music is a sign you're a loser.

Active productive hobbies. For example, instead of just "music" you say you play an instrument.

>i just don't think repeating the mistakes of the feminist movement is a good idea.

The mistake of the feminist movement was that it was run by women.

>giving much importance to girls

for fuck's sake you claim to be fucking intellectuals and can't cope with bird brained individuals like girls?
I am a nazi and I hate minorities of all kinds, gays, and atheist people, I wish death to all of them. but I don't fucking tell that to women, I tell them what they want to hear. you can do the same with your interests.

I read it as Nagel and got excited for a second

>they delete the communist thread but leave up this flimsy troll thread
>the mods do it for free

i hate the analysis of the feminist response in this article

feminists latched on to elliot rodgers because they have literally nothing else to latch on to, similar to how islamaphobic people secretly relish terror attacks because it gives them something to point to, feminist secretly hope that more men will go out and do what elliot rodgers did so they can build a case against them, but despite the hysteria and the assurances of "no this isn't just an isolated incident, this is a cultural issue" there was never another elliot rodgers

the reason why feminists latched on to elliot is because our society, for w/e reason, has decided that victimhood is a perverse form of social currency, and it has decided this at precisely the time where women have stopped having legitimate grievances (that is not to say we have perfect equality, it's to say that the inequality that exists is so trivial that envy and resentment are the main motivating factors against them, not legitimate economic/political disadvantage), hence why things that no sane human being could care about such as 'manspreading' and 'being rude to people on twitter/harassment' have become serious social issues, because women need social capital and they need to invent problems to get it

note that literally nothing is accomplished by discussing something as a "systemic issue", this reinforces my point; if you want people to stop being killed by men with guns then you specifically argue for x legislation against gun ownership, however if you enjoy the perverse pleasure of feeling like you're oppressed and you want that to continue then you go for a systemic critique because nothing will ever materialise from it, literally no nation on the face of this planet has "had a national conversation about x" to fix x.

people point out how cynical it is that mass shootings have become so normal as to be "background noise" but the response to elliot rodger is legitimately one of the most cynical, disgusting things i have ever experienced

>Women gets BTFO by traps

>Not calling them roasties

See, your low power level is showing.

>Her wetness was thick, almost like boogers
man i got some bad news for you but this is a normal part of the menstrual cycle. any healthy girl is going to have this. dont know why it disgusts you though, the feeling of degeneracy in rubbing my hard cock against a tunnel of intermingling bodily secretions always makes me cum the hardest

lmao no, that's 100% sign of a vaginal infection(usually yeast). Hate to break it to you like this, but your girl lied to you lol.

But the vast fucking majority of normies would list those as some of their hobbies.

Does that mean the average normy is a loser? I think the answer is yes, but what do YOU think?

my hobbies are drinking tea and carpentry
what does that make me

... Jesus?

>But only one side of this new Internet gender rivalry is producing killers, and despite what polemicists such as Yiannopoulos are saying, it isn’t the feminists.

Well, no shit. Men are more aggressive than women and are more likely to kill in the first place, regardless of ideology.

Give it a minute. Wait until a few shootings push the Left to the brink. Then we will see.

I gave up having proper friends a while ago now. I have a girlfriend who I fully intend to marry so I'm almost entirely family and career oriented.

I have one friend I go to the football with every couple of months or so, or I go to the odd stag party, but otherwise it's worthless. "Going out with friends" isn't a fucking hobby. It's something you do purely when you have nothing else of value to do with your time. Sure, when I didn't value my time I'd go to the pubs and clubs, but that's literally the most worthless thing I can imagine doing these days. It isn't just a waste of a weekend, it's a waste of hours spent earning that same money throughout the week.

And to meet who, the vapid troglodytes like this woman who have no passions at all? For starters, if you have no discernible interests I seriously doubt you can hold an intersting conversation. More importantly, if you don't take an interest in reading you have absolutely no business writing a book.

If for some reason you're in a scenario where you find yourself needing to list things you enjoy, you're only going to come off as either an idiot or a pompous knob if instead of saying "movies, music and reading" you spout out a list the length of your arm of directors and authors. Ask /fi/t what their hobby is and
I'm sure it isn't just "deadlifting", as /sp/ and it isn't "kicking".

Nobody is interested in what you like to read until you know that 1) you both like to read and 2) you both enjoy the same kind.

you're underestimating how much i like deadlifting

i do feel an odd kinship with you after reading this post, i'm turning 30 this year and have drifted away from many friends now, i play summer hockey with the same people for an hour on fifteen tuesdays a year, lift weights with my gym bro when our schedules coincide, and occasionally i'll do some kind of thing that some people i know are doing, but beyond that i guess i'm friendless, it probably sounds odd to a lot of people but i just don't care to spend the time and energy changing that when i've got so much other stuff to do

honestly i think this whole thread was op asking for help filling out his online dating profile, if you are reading this op then pull up, it's not worth it, there's a whole tier of women down there who use dating sites and you don't want anything to do with them, just do your own thing mayne

>intent of framing nerds as being merely a different kind of sexist.
And she is right. Alt right fags do clamour for reactionary or conservative values

Here it is boys

First of all, nice hex.

Secondly, yes. That's how she should have ended it. The new binary is a new version of patriarchal values expressed by fringe elements of nerd culture, and the new feminism is embodied by tumblr folks who alienate allies and spend valuable political capital on fights punishing microaggressions. This is the new binary that the internet generation has pushed out. Sad, almost funny, and deeply scary both to those who understand it and those who do not.

I argee. I must admit she ended the article over dramatically but that's hardly dilutes her article. Hell I struggled to determine if your post was repeating her opinion or your own, it was qutie similar

Thicc digits

She lays the groundwork but provides no image of what is to be anticipated beyond the vaguest of descriptions. I see no followups, no metrics for scoring political conflict, no thermometer for the internet's temperature as hot or cold. She leaves the work to be done, and I suppose that is what most irks me.

what the fuck is this image even

>journalism
no