Its over

They will die in prison, who cares about the numbers

What are you talking about? Can someone give me a quick bogpill on this thing?

Here is the literal response from the alternative hypothesis
youtube.com/watch?v=7367vdii2Js

Why does sci think link bombardment is a good strategy? Even lit recognizes it as a pathetic attempt at preventing you opponent from being able to check your sources effectively

Slobodan got 20 years in prison for fighting back against the muslim invaders taking over his country. No genocidal muslim leader has been held accountable

How can that be a response if it came out before and is featured in the OP vid.

Your point is also addressed in the OP vid. Meaningful discussion of scientific topics e.g. genetics requires a lot of citations. Most peer-reviewed papers have 30+ references in them.

Sorry, assumed it was his previous video. Since his videos gets spammed for sometime whenever he makes a fool of himself.

How does he address that we can now that the variation in traits between two populations can be know to be genetic without knowing what the genes are? Can we know that pygmies and Australian aboriginals vary in height partially because of genes, without knowing what the genes are?

they gave 20 years for blowing up a bridge (no human casualties) and causing 'grief' to muslims. What a load of BS

>we can know that the variation in traits between two populations can be know to be genetic without knowing what the genes are
You can't for the most part. You might hypothesize that to be the case but until you do the molecular biology you really don't have anything approaching definitive proof. Someone might just as easily attribute it to environmental factors.

He literally talks about the height in the video btw.

Yeah nah. It's bullshit. That's why he killed himself, he actually only had 3yrs left, due to how long he was held. He killed himself because I couldn't agree with corrupt EU fags. He refused to exist as a war criminal.

Yet the Islamic rape gangs in London, Rotherham and every major English city are free to kidnap, rape and murder white children. And they do target white children specifically

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

The people up in arms about jokes about niggers and Isalmophobia, are fine with this. You should take this in consideration when considering the condemnation of racism. You should also take it in consideration with respect to Krauts attempt to take down race realism and his immoral sanctimoniousness on this issue.

>You should also take it in consideration with respect to Krauts attempt to take down race realism
lol isn't this the "my feels are more important than facts" bullshit /pol/ is always criticizing libs for

>You can't for the most part. You might hypothesize that to be the case but until you do the molecular biology you really don't have anything approaching definitive proof. Someone might just as easily attribute it to environmental factors.
That is non-sense, it is a standard of evidence you impose to make the obvious conclusion impossible. A people who do not have a growth spurt during puberty obviously vary in height with respect to other races partially due to genetic. In this case, this is a very significant factor.

You are a brazen liar. You are lying on the behest of a morally insane paradigm. A paradigm that cannot condemn people who torture children to death because of actions of a mercantile empire.

This morality also derives it authority from the Holocaust, hence we should ignore it. It is a moral evil to make it an idol, because of the system that thrives of it. We should forget the crimes of the nazis. Krauts washing away of his since by metaphorically driving away the scapegoat into the desert is a form of depravity

If you hate jews so much, why do you believe in evil?

What the fuck are you talking about

Just watch the part of the video where he talks about this. It starts at 18:08

Easy, I have empathy and I have some basic idea about what to prioritize. To put the wealthiest and most privileged people first is absurd. Especially when the reasoning for establishing them as a morally privileged class unto themselves creates a system that enables child rape gangs, ethnic cleansing etc.

Why are you so much more concerned with jews than the victim of rape gangs? Is it because they are gentile whites? Would you priorities change if white men where raping and murdering black girls?

Everyone in this thread should note how you changes the subject from the rape of white children to jews. Because they do not matter to you

Do you pay any attention to what is happening in this world? Is the worship of science an excuse to be completely isolated from everything happening in this world?

[fart noise]
At least you got dubs.

quick rundown on all this pls
who is the race realist?
who is the sjw soyboy?
who won?
why does it matter if all they amount to are youtube videos?

Evil isn't an invention of empathy, it's an invention of weakness.

So you couldn't respond. You essentially admit that you prioritize the most privileged group on the planet over child rape victims, all with the end goal of being unscientific. You're a real champ. Thanks to people with your attitude and ethics child rape gangs thrive, because they are targeting white children (muh wealthy jews). You are holding back the most promising science that could ever be, as it can be used to make us better at sciene, because you want to advocate on behalf of insane religious fundamentalists and a spoiled dessert tribe.

This is what your morality is, religious loons and a very particular ethnic cohort must be enabled at all ends and means, at the cost of everything else. How fucking scientific and saintly of you. We can't use reasonable evidence to say that various human races are different, because that would undermine your morally insane paradigm.

Don't go Nietzscheiean on us, that is too pathetic. You don't use it in any other argument, and there is no reason to take that seriously now.

Any reader should note this change of tactic, when moral delusion cannot be justified. It suddenly doesn't exist. That is of course until race realism are on the table

i've literally posted two posts in this thread

That hardly matters, we can all read your intention. Please do not mistake anyone reading this thread for being that daft. It is too vulgar, post some pornography instead. it will sooth the egos who need it more than this

okay slave

>p-please validate me
"No."

You're not original for knowing what slave morality is. Nor is it a good argument. Why should anyone take this seriously? There is a reason for why the stereotype of the people who use this argument is someone emaciated and weak. You don't actually see master morality among anyone with any meaningful degree of power. It really is day dreaming for useless.

Coincidentally, it is a form of tactical nihilism to bring up when something you are sympathetic is under attack. This revolting up-side down version of priorities really is your world view. You can't handle it being attacked, but you're the uber mensch? Grow a spine

stop crying about jews on the internet you look pathetic

That is awful psychoanalysis. If you're so scientific why would you go for that? I think you should go for the antisemitism angle again. Please show your character again. don't hide

If I did, you wouldn't go for that angle. You would go for another shaming tactic, everyone has enough experience to know that

no, because I don't need to defend blacks

This is just asinine. You really don't have a leg to stand on. Are we supposed to cry for a people who have a myriad of special legal clauses just for themselves? Is this about them being shot for attacking police officers?

I don't need to defend blacks because I have nothing to defend them for because I don't give a shit about concrete chimps doing retarded shit, experiencing the consequences, and then throwing a riot over it

and even if they were unrightly killed by police I still wouldn't need to defend them because I'm not a fag who whine about evil people on the internet

Who are you trying to fool? First the we need to be worried about the plight of the jews, then morality doesn't exist, suddenly blacks are victims and now they don't matter. At least be consistent in your apologetics. You're a Nietzschean who is offended by attacks on a slave morality? Attacks which essence are what is enabled by the slave morality.

Nietzsche really is the last resort of the progressive

>First the we need to be worried about the plight of the jews
not me
> suddenly blacks are victims
you misunderstood my point and then ignored when I explained it

bye kid, have fun rotting your brain on the alt-right resentment rollercoaster

I don't misunderstand your point nor does anyone else. We have go from race realism is wrong think to nothing really exists within a few posts. The readers of this thread will note that it is a bit odd for a Nietzschean uber mensch to have had his feather ruffled by the idea that evolution resulted in different human races.

Can we go back to psychoanalysis again?