Is this true?

so what happend? why they all drinking listerene and shooting each other?

>mutt post
Those are just mongrels. The purest Amerindians live in andean villages and cities and Guatemalan zones. And those populations are more peaceful and have less crime than eurangutan villages. Amerindians are superior to europeans. How is this hard to get?

Like the painted savages? Killing their children so they can hunt for food and never work a day in their life?

>hunt
All agrarian andean peaceful societies, except some Guatemalan villages which don't kill themselves more than eurangutans and their suicide shithole northern chambers full of drugged piss-haired "people".

Try again, subhuman.

youtube.com/watch?v=o7RTvjd5RtY

>All agrarian andean peaceful societies
If they were peaceful they were savages.

It's as simple as not being violent chimps like eurangutans in europe.

everyone in the americas was a painted savage and they deserved getting raped to death by euros

No. This is pure idiocy. That chart pretends that the only things significant happened in Europe in the last 300 years? As if all Chinese inventions never existed? As if Indian and Middle Eastern mathematicians upon which all European scientific advancements depend never existed?

Europe would still be in the bronze age without China and the Arabs. Whoever made this is a fucking retard.

Where did you get this by the way? It's pretty ridiculous. I want to know who made it so I can get a laugh.

No, but I don't like black people therefore its believable.

significant if big

>arbitrary units of "scientific advancement"

Wrong. Amerindians were more peaceful than savages eurangutans. Try again.

>That chart pretends that the only things significant happened in Europe in the last 300 years?

Please take another look at the graph before you type out another post.

European accomplishment happened in the time when technology was rising.

It's not surprising that they did more. Had China gone through a similar industrial revolution it would likely have been the same.

>the last 300 years

So pretty much the advent of everything...?

being peaceul is what makes you a savage nigger. Its why they spread their legs so their families could be raped to death by spain

uhhh, no. YOU look at the graph again and tell me what 'significant figure' means and how it wasn't arbitrarily decided who is 'significant' for a Eurocentric historian trying to rig the graph in their favor

Do enlighten me

I don't think you're mentally adequate enough to further this conversation.

I bet you think every culture contributed equally to the progress of mankind.

Dumb fucking PC moron. Holding back history with your self deluded biases.

Of course I don't believe every culture contributed equally. That's absurd. But pointing out that the graph has an obvious agenda and is stupid as shit doesn't mean I'm a PC faggot or whatever other slurs you attempt. I'm pointing out the graph is flawed.

What does 'significant' mean? How is that determined? Who decided what would be included?

Face reality, the graph is flawed.

That book was written with the purpose of documenting the accomplishments of our species as a whole and all its cultures.

Yes, it *looks* flawed and Western biased, but it really isn't.

There are even passages detailing how much better the east was over the west.

Wrong. Diseases massacred Amerindians for centuries. Social cohesion and cooperation has been maintained by Amerindian societies for millenia. Yet Amerindians have demonstrated a higher development rate compared to europeans. In other words, Amerindians have more civilization potential compared to europeans. In conclusion, Amerindians are superior to europeans.

Try again, chimpo.

That doesn't excuse it. The same book written in China would obviously favor the east with some little credit thrown in for the Europeans.

cooperation is faggoty. They should be killed for bein such ponces. And were

>The same book written in China would obviously favor the east with some little credit thrown in for the Europeans.

That's a very big assumption and obnoxious disrespect for the people who have to set aside personal bias in order to even further works such as this.

Not everything is pandering to self entitlement.

Wrong. Diseases killed them all, most battles against Incas were won by imperial Incas. Amerindians have demonstrated militar superiority agains europeans too. Try again, subhuman.

if they were suprior they would've have been raped to death and made to work the silver mines with a 3 year life expectancy as slaves.

Amerindian superiority is based on their higher development rate compared to europeans, in other words, they having more civilziation potential. If civilization potential is an indication of superiority, then Amerindians are superior to europeans. How is this hard to get?

Their civilization was human sacrifices, cannibalism, and being retarded/ Like you

Amerindians had less of those traits compared to chalcolithic and early bronze age sacrifices, and subhumans on europe. Try again, monkey.

That was stamped out by the roman empire. Whereas retards in loinclothes do it to this day in Madagascar.

>that was stamped
Irrelevant. Amerindians have demonstrated more civilization potential than europeans. How is this even a question?

they have no potential. They have invented nothing. They are nothing more than squatters

SeeAmerindians have achieved what europeans "did" in less than half the time, even though they had more disadvantages compared to europeans. Try again, subhuman.

No empire, no battleships, no steel, no code of laws, no philosophy, they were just gears in the spanish machine. Their children were the oil.

>no x
Compared to whom/what year?

Roman Empire vs former kingdoms incorporated by Spain

>27BC roman empire
>Amerindians having 15000 years of offset
Let's see:
27BC+15000 years of offset = 14973AD
Yet Amerindians had already developed middle-ages tier engineering in less time compared to europeans. Try again.

they never had marble. the never had cement, they never had steel. They never caught up to Rome. They built their cities on mountains where their children would fall to their deaths, and lakes where they would get diseases. To fix these problems they would sacrifice each other on altars until Spain turned them into soil.

>material comparison
Subhumans...
Northern and mesoamerindians already used varities of marble. And they had been used by egyptians before romans. AND I'm not even counting the 15kyears offset.
>steel
>1800BC in anatolia
1800BC + 15000 offset = 13200AD
Amerindians already reached the early bronze age in 1000AD.
>get diseases
Actually Amerindians have demonstrated better holistic behavior against epidemics compared to europeans. Try again.
>fix problems
America belongs to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans. Deal with it, subhuman.

It all belongs to God. Humans can eat shit.
>they used it before
no, they used limestone.
>theb ronze age
retard olympics right there

>belongs to god
So you agree with Amerindian superiority?
>limestone
Wrong, they used many varieties of ign.rocks yet they some metamorphic rocks are classified as types of marble, even though the specific carbonate mineral based rock is what romans used after greeks. And the roman times was already compared to Amerindians here.Inferior to Amerindians.

>30000 years to reach bronze age meanwhile Amerindians did it with half the time
Yes, europeans are subhuman retards.

600000000 billion years of history = painted shitskins get murdered
Whties 6000000 billion years = Become living Gods and rule over painted shitkins

30kyears ago, Amerindians didn't exist, you dumb subhuman. Amerindians have demonstrated more civilization potential than europeans. Deal with it, bonobo.

>they didn't exist
their ancestors lived on the land tho. Since they fucked moooses and became one iwth the land So they're paitned shitskins too.
60000000 billion years = painted shitkins trip over their words
600000000 billion years = whites murder them to this day for talking back to them

>ancestors
There were no humans in America before 25000BC, dumb subhuman.

Are you a united statian, mutt?

The ancestors of Amerindians and europeans were the same in 40000BC, dumb subhuman, except the more neanderthal-ish and denisovan influence found in Amerindians.

Is this a stealth /pol/ thread?

This is ignoring that europe was a frozen wasteland the majority of this time.