Is this true?
Is this true?
Other urls found in this thread:
more or less
Symbolic Algebra is one hell of a drug.
It's as true as affirmations such as chinese being the number 1 people living in Asia, or Africans dealing with sunny arid environments.
Yet if you want to draw conclusions from there, for example superiority and civilization potential, then, as Amerindians had a higher development rate compared to europeans. The logical conclusion would be that Amerindians are superior to europeans.
Farming alone in the ancient era beats the sum of all scientific advances in the future.
"higher developement rate".
lmao
Is it true they invented the rock, and the stick thousands of years before the euros?
>europeans:
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to solutrean:10000 years (30000BC-20000BC)
>from aurignacian-antelian to neolithic: 15000 years(30000BC-15000BC)
>from neolithic proto-agriculture societies to neolithic revolution: 6000 years (15000BC-9000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to copper and arsenical bronze: 4000 years (9000BC-5000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to bronze age and tin bronze: 5200 years (9000BC-3800BC)
>Amerindians:
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to clovis: 4000 years (15000BC-11000BC)
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to the start of crop development: 7000 years (15000BC-8000BC)
>from neolithic proto-agriculture societies to neolithic revolution: 5000 years (8000BC-3000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to copper and arsenical bronze independently: 2000 years (3000BC-1000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to bronze age and tin bronze: 4000 years (3000BC-1000 AD)
Amerindians had a higher development rate compared to europeans. In other words, Amerindians had more civilization potential than europeans. Amerindians are superior to europeans. Deal with it.
"Civilization potential".
Yes.
Montezuma pro has entered the thread. Thread is now officially dead.
>eurangutan circlejerk ended
Amerindian facts will never be erased. Face it.