Black Holes arent infinite

My grandfather’s name was Hammus. His face was scary ugly. We called him Heinous Anus. My siblings and I didn’t know what we were calling him until I reach high school and realized what we where calling him. I told my brother and sisters. We were all horrified. Nobody in my family seems to know who named him that or why EVERYONE called him that. At his funeral last year my cousins were telling stories about Heinouse Anus at the church. WTF??! I asked if they realized what they were calling him. Everyone we confronted had a similer reaction. My Uncle could not wrap his head around the fact that the WHOLE family referred to his dad as HENIOUSE ANUS for fucking years and years! He just kept shaking his head with his whole face furrowed repeating his name over and over again in disbelief and disgust. I tried broaching the subject with my mom after everyone started asking questions about his nickname. She cut me off at Heinouse, then acted like that name was never to be spoken out loud. But she herself called him that!

Can’t believe we all called him that to his face. HENIOUSE FUCKING ANUS was my grandfather!

...

neutron stars are extremely dense and extremely small, much the same as yourself.

anyway since we cant see inside a black hole it's irrelevant what is inside them. It's either near-infinite energy, or it's a place without time and no movement so no energy. either way if you fell into one you'd die instantaneously at the event horizon.

absolutely retarded conclusion

...

Heniouse Anus Anal Gland Cookies

>anyway since we cant see inside a black hole it's irrelevant what is inside them. It's either near-infinite energy
No, it's not.

>or it's a place without time and no movement so no energy.
No, it's not.

Black holes have a finite and measurable mass, and thus energy. Maybe you were thinking of infinite density?

>either way if you fell into one you'd die instantaneously at the event horizon.
Not necessarily, and probably not exactly at the event horizon anyway.

>muh supermassive black holes at the centre of galaxies
You do realise that the scales where's talking about here are in the region where GR is provably no longer a reliable theory, right? This is all circular, speculative fudging.

(I am not OP; but he seems to have copied and butchered some of my claims.)

>You do realise that the scales where's talking about here are in the region
>where GR is provably no longer a reliable theory, right?
What scales would those be? You've never studied GR, have you?

if its a self contained star generating energy that cannot escape, it's near infinite energy. It's a closed system that feeds back into itself. You have mistaken the fact thst it has mass with the fact it does not lose mass, unlike stars that radiate their energy away.