Who's the Right wing equivalent of Chomsky?

Who's the Right wing equivalent of Chomsky?

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.co.uk/Stefan-Molyneux/e/B00HMCFDSI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Calvin
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Sowell

zizek

Right wing and intellectual are mutually exclusive terms

Evola

molyneux

The Right has a fundamentally different basis than the left.
Essentially, people like Chomsky take Utilitarianism assume it and roll with it using data. Right wing thought generally strays from that quite a lot, something exemplified by Evola completely disregarding the good of the people and favoring traditions etc with some exceptions in center-right.
Ultimately, having a great right wing intellectual would be hard.

He didn't publish any books.

he doesn;t publish his books... he publishes his mind....

I live in an extremely right wing country and there are many right wing intellectuals in it. Famous example is Japan.

No he doesn't. He's a cult leader through and through.

Evola and Schmitt.

Considering Chomsky is the father of modern linguistics, and all his most noteworthy students are also liberals - there is no right wing Chomsky.

underrated

nice digits, bad post

...

nice digits, great post

Chesterton, probably.

Western Culture has become so left-wing our formerly left-wing intellectuals are so well situated in right-wing discussions you can get called a nazi for quoting British socialists, what a riot.

...

...

You obviously don't keep up to date with Chinese academia.

Please give some examples of right wing chinese academics. I'd love some new reading material.

Look at that hair. How do you have to use the comb to achieve that?

How was that film by the way

oh i thought that was houellebecq from the thumbnail, till i zoomed in

I believe he was capable of making his hair form that shape through sheer force of will alone, no hands required. It was apparently quite draining for him, however, and he would only be able to regain his strength after several dishes of fresh fruit, a bath in scalding hot water and being lightly tapped in each testicle with a small wooden mallet.

Life is, after all, only aesthetically justified.

pure ideology

There isn't really any outstanding individuals, Its the current trends in Chinese academia that are interesting, religion are now universally praised, interest and support of nationalism has exploded, nihilism is lambasted, etc.

Its actually way easier to operate as a Tradionalist/Monarchist than a Liberal or Marxist in China now.

That's really neat. I'll have to look into that.

bad digits, nice post

Keith Preston

this guy

Abdal Hakim Murad

>no mention of this man
come on, he's pretty good on his own field but retarded when it comes to politics but still somehow is really popular, accessible and agreeable for normies and people who dont concern themselves too much with politics, hates the establishment on his side but is somehow liked by them, published books that everyone on his side has read at some point

>
amazon.co.uk/Stefan-Molyneux/e/B00HMCFDSI

>comparing Molyneux's rant pamphlets to the works of Chomsky
hehe

because he is a libertarian, a fucking idiot.

Overrated

bomb the muzzies, drone war now!

this.

Islam is a saving grace for the Right wing but they don't see it yet

how so?

unfortunately Chomsky can't really be compared to anybody who has actually had success outside of the classroom.

And unlike Chomsky Sowell didn't bend at the knees in the recent election.

They espouse right-wing ideas of traditionalism, yet are immune from liberal criticism because that would be "racist."

Why wouldn't they oppose Islam? either they win and win or they lose and win, they literally cant lose.

roger scruton? oldish "public intellectual" working in broadly analytic phil tradition but vocal about contemporary politics with recourse to old traditions in political theory.
chomsky is deeper i think philosophically and maybe more famous and scruton is a bit silly but think there are some parallels

Nick Land

he's been advocating for socialism lately, in the context of AI/automation and massive job loss

True. It's a powerful weapon. I wonder if/when any of this madness will stop. Probably not...

The terrorists come along and set the bombs, but the rest of the time people seem adept at terrorizing themselves in conditions of peacetime.

The western Right only opposes islam because they hate all cultural foreigners. But if they took some time to analyze what they stand for and what Islam stands for, they'd find their ideologies aren't so different.

Why are people worried about automation, AI, massive job loss? Humanity has no issue with it. It's a self regulating organism. Poor and jobless will be gone from this world through social eugenics more ro less

>right wing
>left wing

This desu

They're worried about not being needed. In a society where all your hard work and persistence means nothing and the next generation just gets 100% leisure, people tend to have existential crises. Not that socialism's a bad thing though, it'll just take some getting used to.

I guess my point is that we are compatible with it. Not unlike getting hit with a meteor or a thermo nuclear war.

we'll all just make art, do drugs, and chill out. it's funny to me that some people have been so buttfucked by capitalism that they think this kind of life would be a nightmare.

Veeky Forums's lack of knowledge of British philosophy disappoints me.

He's a communist you retard

Confirmed

Eh, he is totally outside of the right/left paradygm, and so is his influence on the intelllectual world.

He is right wing only if you consider a presocratic Athene democracy (which is also consciousnof the root of its traditions) right-wing.

Unironically Steve Bannon, if he's as erudite as Politico and other interviews portray him to be.

Their opposition to Islam derives primarily from its followers being stupid Arabs and from not being Western. This is probably for the best because I don't particularly want to see Islam with Aryan values.

Even Hitler was a fan of Islam while disliking the Arabs and viewing them as an inferior race.

Athenian democracy was about as right wing as it gets. It was tons of tiny, decentralized ethnonationalist states.

>dude weed lmao
Not everyone is a loser like you, bub.

spooky

Chomsky might even be considered right wing by today's standards

how? chomsky is even against pornography

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Calvin

>Who's the Right wing equivalent of Chomsky?

That's considered very right wing
The biggest thing though, is that he's what most liberals would call him a "biological essentialist"
He's also defended holocaust denial

Quads of absolute truth

where can I learn more about this?

What's wrong with his face? He looks ill.

Digits confirms it.

Terrible post. Chomsky continues to complain about how America has moved further and further to the right over recent decades, and how the Republican party has become an extreme right wing group not to be taken seriously, while the Democrats, no longer on the left, are now slightly right of center. To Chomsky even Sanders is a little too far to the right on some issues. To your average American, who knows very little about politics, Sanders is on the far left.