So, is race real, Veeky Forums?

It's literally basic genetics. I can't fathom anyone with a functioning brain stating otherwise to be honest.

Nobody has outright denied this. However, we can test genomes, and humans have been found to be incredibly similar, more than things like dog breeds. And the differences we do find do not break down into race as we know it. That's really all there is to it.

>no one
Wasn't there a scientist who got doxxed to hell because he said something along the lines of, "there's no reason to believe seperate groups of people evolved to have the same genetic disposition for intelligence.

I'm pretty sure most Libtards will outright deny it.

Pretty sure you'll be hounded out of academia for stating that racial differences in intelligence exist.

I agree with you that humans are similar, more so than domesticated animals that underwent artificial selection. It may not take too many genes to go from an IQ of 85 and 100. However those 15 points of IQ matter immensely in terms of creating and sustaining a civilization.

Scientists are retarded in talking to the public. If he simply said the differences are miniscule (which is true), nobody would really care. Saying there is clear inferiority advocates for forced eugenics.

I don't condone doxxing no matter what though. I also am not going to let the way people react to things sway my thoughts.

>scientists are retarded in talking to the public
No the public is retarded in understanding science.
Science does not cater to your feelings. You shouldn't need to dance around a subject using subjective terms like minuscule to pacify the rabid dogs of anti-intellectualism. He stated something that was objectively true and for such an outrageous thing, he was ostracized.

No.

inb4 "all the scientists are lying and its a massive jewish coverup!"

>However those 15 points of IQ matter immensely in terms of creating and sustaining a civilization.
You're only able to say that because the only permanent civilizations (an extremely new concept) have come largely from Europe and Asia so far.

Even Rome didn't sustain a civilization. Are you going to make excuses for them?

There were plenty of African empires comparable to pre-Rome Europe ones that had plenty of success. They all fall for whatever reason. Again, a civilization NOT falling is a completely new concept.

I never mentioned any races or that a species with an IQ of 85 can't create a civilization, I just implied it would be reasonable to assume a population of a species that has a higher IQ than another population would likely have a better civilization.

You jumping to conclusions and automatically assuming that I said black people are intellectually inferior says more about you than me.

It's what the thread turned into. I was just going with the flow of the conversation. I can't tell which posts are yours if any.