/mg/ -- Anti-LEM edition

by definition of negation

>by definition of negation
Which definition?

[math]\textit{the}[/math] definition. if something is false, the negation on this something is true and vice versa.

>the definition.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negation#Definition

>No agreement exists as to the possibility of defining negation, as to its logical status, function, and meaning, as to its field of applicability..., and as to the interpretation of the negative judgment

so, contrapositive doesn't work? you say negation isn't defined but countless times again it's application in the classical mathematical sense yields practical results

>so, contrapositive doesn't work?
correct

>you say negation isn't defined
I didn't say that, there are multiple definitions.

>correct
you're wrong. what is this, some Wildbergian type philosophy you're arguing with?

>you're wrong.
What do you mean?

tell me, if a sequence is convergence does this imply it is bounded?

>tell me, if a sequence is convergence does this imply it is bounded?
Yes, but what's the relevance?