Good night, sweet prince

Good night, sweet prince.

nytimes.om/2017/04/10/books/noam-chomsky-linguist-is-dead-at-88.html

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=IzRhFH5OyHo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

RIP in pieces.

I knew this was goign to happen some day, he was 88 and it still feels too soon.

This is a sad day for lit/

Mods, we had a sticky for that fat fuck who wrote sci-fi, we should have one for Chomsky

>.om

>Server not found

he was a second-tier philosopher. it's kind of sad that Veeky Forums only knows him from his political commentary. I like generative grammar, though.

>tfw leftist
>tfw now that he's dead I'll have to think for myself

leftist wisdom made him immortal, dumbass

Damn you had me going there, I was almost as happy as the day Gore Vidal died.

Holy shit you bastard.

William Buckley please leave

Whoa it's actually real for this one time. RIP Chomster

Castro and Chomsky dead, a Red Senate, Congress, and President Trump.
It almost brings a tear to the eye.
youtube.com/watch?v=IzRhFH5OyHo

Aw I've taken the bait.
Maybe next year...

HOLY FUCK IT'S REAL???
SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT!!!

I've had an email to him about Foucault's pheremones saved as a draft for months!!!

F

GRRM died?

I hope he and Friedman will not disagree too bitterly, for too long, in the next world.

Not even trying OP

>>
>Mods, we had a sticky for that fat fuck who wrote sci-fi, we should have one for Chomsky


>american ''''''''''''''''''philosophy'''''''''''

Fake and gay

I wish this was real and this cunt was actually dead.

Chomsky is the biggest scammer in the linguist community, a fraud, and he needs to just fuck off already.

When this devious Jew first published his theory of the language module, the part of the brain unique to humans, that allows us and only us to learn languages, he began the most successful scam in academia.

you CANNOT test for proof of the language module, because to do so you would need to isolate human children, raise them without contact from other humans, and observe the outcome, Chomsky's assertion is that language would naturally develop in this community.

Obviously this would be an unethical experiment

Obviously no University would allow this type of testing on children

Obviously Chomsky new about this as an undergraduate, yet he still chose to push it as a post graduate.

There's a reason no linguist is comfortable having chomsky working with them, its because his name is synonymous with fraud.

t. a real linguist.

Goy f yourself, Go.

>Chomsky's assertion is that language would naturally develop in this community.
His argument is that it would not
And this is born out by the examples of 'wild children'

No that's not it
You literally have it backwards
The language facaulty needs stimulation
This is borne out by the several cases of wild children raised without human contact

>There's a reason no linguist is comfortable having chomsky working with them, its because his name is synonymous with fraud.
Stop lying

Why is he so fucking retarded?

nah

quints confirmed truth. This is now a Chomsky Appreciation thread

This is exactly how most critics of Chomsky come off to me. The vast majority of them are severely ignorant of his actual arguments and usually simply have some agenda that opposes his. On top of this I believe I have discovered unique evidence in favor of a specific model of UG that should allow me to show exactly how the ability to understand specific forms of hierarchical structure arises in the human mind, and predict exactly what specific people will not be able to process when they lack this.

>all these kids hating Chomsky just to be contrarian
Isn't it past your bedtime?

>Everybody who doesn't worship a known genocide denier is a Contrarian
Good post.

Exhibit A

>Trying this hard
Exhibit t.

Fuck all of you


especially you

>Noam "self-plagiarism don't real" Chomsky
>2017

I wish this was real and this cunt was actually dead.

Newton is the biggest scammer in the cemistry community, a fraud, and he needs to just fuck off already.

When this devious Anglo first published his manual of alchemy, the mystification and obscuration of actul chemistry, which allows us to make predictions about matter and its reaction, he began the most successful scam in academia.

you CANNOT test for proof of his alchemic formulae, because to do so you would need to disregard most of our already established notions: Newton's assertion is that Chemistry is just a deviation of alchemy.

Obviously this would be regressive pseudo-scientism.

Obviously no sane chemist would give his seal of approval to this method

Obviously Newton knew about this as an undergraduate, yet he still chose to push it as a post graduate.

There's a reason no chemistis comfortable having Newton working with them, its because his name is synonymous with fraud.

t. a real chemist.

Your missing the point.

Wild children (and feral children such as Genie) can't develope language as they litrially have no one else to communicate with.

Can you see the problem now? Can you see how devious his scam is?

You can't prove his hypothesis with isolated children OR a community of isolated children. You can't prove his hypothesis at all. But fuck, you sure can make a lot of money touring and lecturing about it can't you?

Linguists are actually capable of conducting research that proves/disproves a hypothesis, they're scientists. Chomsky isn't, he's a (mediocre) philosopher and that it.

He didnt deny anything
You should read the man not what others say about him

While I appreciate good satire, you have intentionally obfuscated the argument by comparing a scientist and a charlatan.

A scientist whose methods and experiments can be recreated by other scientists, and the charlatan who only put forward conjecture which can neither be proven or studied by others.

Your false equivalence is well written, but still ultimately droll.

You got me excited for a second :(

He said that all forms of pornography exploit women.

A man makes porn that only involves 2 men: Chomsky is proven to be a liar once more.

He is opposed to people being objects or objectified
He is opposed to people being compelled by economic needs
And with so much of porn made up of women who have college or other debts to pay off
Its a natural conclusion

Good ol' Noam, one of the greatest con men of the 20th Century.
No - his linguistics are good. I am talking about the fake Socialism he pawns off on college kids and other naive suckers.
He has *publicly admitted* he is faking and, well, his supporters don't care!
I'm glad he's still alive - he makes me smile.

except there are people that make porn for their own gratification.

objection to that form of objectification is marxist nonsense.

We are aloud to take delight in our own form, and Chomsky is a prude to disagree. next that faggot will be objecting to nude statues.

Good hes still alive.

Cos i want to fight that shithead.

>We are aloud to take delight in our own form
?We are aloud to take delight
>We are aloud
>are aloud
>aloud

invoking marxism in your critique was just regular nonsense. come on man, higher standards.

That was his point: Newton's alchemic studies are pseudo-scientific trash, but this still does not invalidate most of his work. The same applies to Chomsky: saying that that statement is his only contribution to the field of linguistics (or implying that that is the foundation of his entire theory) is just dishonest.

Fuck you, OP.

>Genie
She actually disproves the Innate Language Acquisition theory, becuase of her difficulties in adopting normal language. But yes, its not really an experiment that can be recreated.

Your mom publicly admitted to working in glory holes servicing BBC

>Unironically believing that women are on the other side of glory holes.

Wew

Everyone look at the average Chomsky "booster"
What Chomsky does-
>Makes millions working for the Army
>Invests his millions in Big Ag, Big Pharma, and DoD contractors, greatly expanding his vast wealth
>Puts his work and money into trusts to avoid paying taxes
>Lives in a huge,multi-million dollar mansion in an all-White, gated community with armed guards
>Fiercely protects his intellectual property with lawsuits
What Chomsky says-
>Working for the army is immoral and no one should do it
>Big Ag, Big Pharma, and DoD contractors are evil and their money is tainted; no one should profit from these things
>Not paying taxes is evil
>People shouldn't have more money or house than they "need"
>Armed security is bad
>Intellectual property is a sham
There are two reasons this is really funny
1) He freely admits he has a mansion, trusts, etc. when asked
2) Idiots pay him princely speaking fees to come repeat What He Says and they not only listen, *they try to follow his advice*.
He is a snake oil salesman for the 21st Century!