Philosophy is for the unenlightened

Philosophy is for the unenlightened.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=T5lBiyTwcR4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

no it's not

Yes it is :^)

Philosophy is preparation for theology.

fakir stare is cruise control for initiation

>t. unenlightened

>tfw you've always thought that Aleister looked like Vincent Price

That's... Weird.

Enlightenment is for the unphilosophical.

Everything is for something.

But philosophy is for the unenlightened.

If not for the unenlightened, philosophy would not be.

Theology is for who then, if not the enlightened through philosophy.

Ya'll niggas be sleeping on mysticism

Medicine is for the sick. And if there's anything this world is, it's sick.

Theology is philosophy in cloth, for the unenlightened.

This world is unenlightened. Hence their philosophy.

Muh words
They Uhm
Wait, I'm cumming
Yeah They
AAHHH
have meaning
see...
>But it's not philosophy
youtube.com/watch?v=T5lBiyTwcR4

Before enlightenment, chop wood carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood carry water.

Agreed, philosophy is a spook.

I think most contemporary philosophies would reject many of the Enlightenment points of view - especially postmodern ones.

So, obviously, Philosophy is for the Un-Enlightened.

Muh nigga

purposeful obfuscation is for the unenlightened sure in the dark.

I always imagined the Judge in Blood Meridian looking like this guy

>Here's this half-made up anecdote from antiquity that just happens to be the missing piece to my idiotic morphological system
>It also proves that everything I say is right

>philosophy

>Implying you aren't all just the Ape-man on the island of Dr. Moreau running around and repeating Prendricks 'big thinks' that are really just nonsensical ramblings

It speaks but makes no sound.

>t.British spy

Crowley is almost exclusively read by plebs but you have to be a patrician to appreciate him. Sad that he's such a caricature now. If you understand alchemy and cabala and have read the primary sources you see what a genius he really was.

>genius

>appreciating constant abba-abab-tier poems

They are ENJOYABLE exactly because of their mediocrity. The stuff of a nicely turned rap lyric, today. They can be great fun (Hymn to Pan) but they contain what we now understand to be "cringey" if done wrong. He honestly isn't that good of a writer, though, he was merely a quotable obsessive who took the trouble to meme his texts to the point that scholars, who must first of all have texts, are increasingly looking at his work these decades.

Pleb detected. Part I of Liber ABA is sublime.