Find 1 (one) flaw with these books

Find 1 (one) flaw with these books.

Other urls found in this thread:

socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5323
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

the one on the right has a creased dust jacket

I strongly suspect that nobody on Veeky Forums has read all three books

They're not of equal thickness

That is a shame. He's the best Anti-Marxist author.

They are not organized chromatically.

Worth reading I presume?

>finish years of research, spending long nights reading obscure journals that not even the most dedicated academics will read
>pour through hundreds upon hundreds of books relating to theory, philosophy, and history
>finally finish after several arduous years
>sit down to relax with a glass of whisky
>guy walks by the window and says "they ain't the right kinda thick"
>everything is shattered.

Reading is for homos.

You read his reply, ha! Checkmate.

If you're interested in learning about Marxism from the perspective of the historian of ideas it is great.

Kolakowski took British Marxists (including Hobsbawm, Stalinist apologist) to task so hard he wrote an open letter entitled "My Correct Views on Everything."

socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5323

Kolakowski fucking rules.

It's a massive reference work.

Flaw : he's one of those authors that includes foreign language quotations without offering up the translation

>tfw monolingual

what language?

He's arguing against a strawman of historical materialism, just like 99% of people who ever claimed to have refuted it.

Read Castoriadis if you want a decent critique of Marxism.

>He's arguing against a strawman of historical materialism
explain how he's doing that with an example

for you

Find 1 (one) flaw with these books.

I don't like fairy tails

They have dust jackets.

they're heresy

The middle one seems to imply that there has been a golden age for Marxism.

While all organized religion can be reasonably concluded to be based, in substantial part, on fraud in the case of Mormonism we actually have legal record to back that claim up.

it just means the period when marxist thought had its most influence

Yes, divining was considered fraudulent by educated people in the Prophet's time (including by the judge who convicted him), but by many country folk (including Smith), it was considered a legitimate practice.

>I think I'm smarter than I really am

I only asked for one.

>While all organized religion can be reasonably concluded to be based, in substantial part, on fraud

Cite your sources

Not enough pictures

Good sense probably
What he said wasn't even controversial