>My IQ is 100 and I'm WAY more retarded than the average person
This poster is good proof against IQ.
IQ and race
IQ is pseudoscience, races aren't real
t. neurobiologist who took population genetics as an undergrad
I'd assume the average IQ of people flying overseas is higher than the average IQ of people not flying overseas. There is no scientific reason to draw dividing lines based on melanin content or face structure though, since they're obviously sliding scales.
Wrong.
I have a couple of problems with this point. There have been famines in fairly high IQ countries before, does that mean that the average IQ dropped beforehand? This also assumes that Africa is a fertile land, which is not true, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.
>images with transparent background that should be white
Unfortunately, IQ is not as accurate as other sciences and lacks a scientific basis. That would put IQ in the pseudoscientific category.
The use of "race" is outdated. Also, it's not based on science and the new taxonomy classification methods. That would put "race" in the pseudoscience category too.
No wonder there are people trying to shill for this kind of "knowledge", for political or ideological reasons. First they try to convince you about "harmless" """"science"""", then the "conclusion" would be killing the "inferior" or just discrimination of the less "favoured". To be fair, this is not the case either. As these topics are pseudoscience, they will only convince people who lack scientific knowledge or people who share a similar political or ideological stance.
>Unfortunately, IQ is not as accurate as other sciences and lacks a scientific basis.
What makes IQ testing unscientific? Do you have facts to back up this claim?
>The use of "race" is outdated.
How so? Nowadays you can determine a person's race with a cotton swab of his spit.
Seems to me that you're disregarding science because it disagrees with your egalitarian worldview...