Why do you weebs care about incoherent cranks like mochizuki while my boy scholze is revolutionizing number theory?
Why do you weebs care about incoherent cranks like mochizuki while my boy scholze is revolutionizing number theory?
Austin King
Camden Ward
>As a student, he participated in the International Mathematics Olympiad, winning three gold medals and one silver medal.[7]
>one silver medal
brainlet
Henry Wright
He's only "incoherent" because you're too lazy to put the effort in
Daniel Diaz
Jayden Hill
I don’t give a shit about this soyboy but I definitely don’t care about le ABC man either
Nicholas Roberts
>appeal to authority
Jose Martin
I guess just go back to >>>/anyotherboard/ then
Colton Kelly
Fuck off brainlet, this is a Wiles board.
Gabriel Hughes
>The experts agree with me
>Woit: theoretical physicist
>Calegari: relies on second-hand accounts, doesn't seem to have put effort into understanding the papers "Each time I hear of an analysis of Mochizuki’s papers by an expert..."
You were saying?
Austin Brown
If Mochizuki is an incoherent crank, then what has Yamashita written in his exposition of the proof?
Justin Howard
You know who else was an "incoherent crank"?
Elijah Murphy
appeal to authority isn't actually a fallacy, user
inappropriate appeal to authority is.
it is a weak argument though
Levi Edwards
>fallacy
Smells like teen spirit.
Informal fallacies are just that, informal. They neither prove nor disprove anything. They are at best heuristics for detecting bullshit in prose arguments.
Carson Garcia
shitty band, shitty post
Appeal to authority is only bullshit under certain circumstances grungebro.
Asher Ramirez
He is cute!
Kayden Cook
If those two are "experts" then why do neither of them actually talk about the contents of the papers at all in either of those blog posts?
Hudson Kelly
Gibberish. He's just trying to cover his co-national's back. Asian collectivism and all that.
Carter Gonzalez
That’s what I said you retarded nigger
Joseph Gomez
>nigger
Why the racism?
James Hill
Can anyone summarize some of his results for an idiot? Like his idea of perfectoid cases helped with this so called weight monodromy conjecture or whatever its called? I mean I've looked at wikipedia and basically read jibberish and it was cool but yeah didn't get much on that pass through.
Blake Hughes
what a cute little twink
Jack Davis
Not just co-nationals, yamashita is in mochizuki's inner circle at kyoto university.
Benjamin Kelly
>woit
>>>>>>>>expert
Jayden Rodriguez
If you don't know any of the background about number theory, I don't know why you expect to understand cutting edge research.
Luke Jenkins
I saw that breaddit thread too friend. :)