>shill for this kind of "knowledge", for political or ideological reasons.
The insistence that there is no such thing as race, which flies in the face of common sense and understanding, is itself a political and ideological stance and one which is without scientific basis or merit in my opinion. The divisions of race are clear to anyone who is intellectually honest and is routinely referred to in genetics. The only reason that genetics shills for the 'no race' interpretation is because our current political climate has been hijacked by the following political ideologies;
cultural marxism
relativism
multiculturalism
and political correctness
Does human races/populations exist?
James James
Ayden Roberts
...
Sebastian Brown
The only thing worse than /pol/tards is people who scream "go back to /pol/" when a conversation they find offensive is started.
Caleb Roberts
go back
Brayden Morgan
no u
Wow I sure showed you. Faggot.
Joseph Collins
>cultural marxism
You are deluded.
James Adams
Already refuted.
IQ and race aren't science. Why do you keep denying reality?
IQ and race are pseudoscience.
Charles Howard
>europeans:
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to solutrean:10000 years (30000BC-20000BC)
>from aurignacian-antelian to neolithic: 15000 years(30000BC-15000BC)
>from neolithic proto-agriculture societies to neolithic revolution: 6000 years (15000BC-9000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to copper and arsenical bronze: 4000 years (9000BC-5000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to bronze age and tin bronze: 5200 years (9000BC-3800BC)
>Amerindians:
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to clovis: 4000 years (15000BC-11000BC)
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to the start of crop development: 7000 years (15000BC-8000BC)
>from neolithic proto-agriculture societies to neolithic revolution: 5000 years (8000BC-3000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to copper and arsenical bronze independently: 2000 years (3000BC-1000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to bronze age and tin bronze: 4000 years (3000BC-1000 AD)
Amerindians had a higher development rate compared to europeans. In other words, Amerindians had more civilization potential than europeans.
How is this hard to get?
Ethan Lewis
SeeRace and IQ aren't science. They are pseudoscience.
Bentley Morris
So they developed faster and yet lost and got colonized and nearly lost their entire people?