I mean it's clearly just bullshit trying to save face in order to make their current climate change hysteria look valid. The people would wake up too easily if they didn't try to invalidate the shit they were saying back then. In a few years they'll be saying "W-we didn't all agree that the Earth was warming! That was just a few extremists!" and we'll be back to square one.
My cousin is in denial that climate change is caused by people, and that it's a really big fucking problem...
Benjamin Gutierrez
Juan Myers
People back then didn't know the difference between seasonal sea ice, ice shelves, and continents, nor do they have icebreaker ships. They just drew the edge of the continent whenever they see sea ice and their ship cannot pass through.
This is giving these early explorers the biggest benefit of the doubt. Likelier explanation is that they're not that bright and they all die at 40 of scurvy because they don't understand nutritions
Adrian Gomez
ayy lmao
Owen Ross
Again, too much of a brainlet to come up with an actual rebuttal and just resort to ad hom and other fallacious """arguments."""
Go put on your big boy pants, and do some reading. Your entire argument of a "consensus" in global cooling in the 1970s is simply put, a fraudulent and false argument with no basis in reality, yet all you can do is rant and rave and try to change the subject because the truth is you have no actual argument to present.
>The people would wake up too easily if they didn't try to invalidate the shit they were saying back then. In a few years they'll be saying "W-we didn't all agree that the Earth was warming! That was just a few extremists!" and we'll be back to square one.
The only "hysterical" person I see in this thread is the autist that took the time to write out this shite and un-ironically believes in it.
The sad truth is you're just another dunning kruger, low information tard that has deluded themselves into believing they have all the answers, and that everyone else is wrong because you're so super smart and special, better than all the (((sheeple))) that blindly believe in evidence based science. Go you for being such an edgy moron I guess.
Christian Cruz
So you believe things are true because they're a fact? You should be able to argue for everything you hold true to yourself.
Jacob Ramirez
kek
Dominic Smith
>is simply put, a fraudulent and false argument with no basis in reality
Of course you'll say that because if you admitted that they were dead wrong back then it puts a huge hole in your current hysteria pushing. Fact is The exact same percentage of scientists who are sure gloabal warming is occuring now thought global cooling was occuring a few decades ago. Not surprising in the least that a few of them are desperate to go back and scrub the record clean. Doomsaying doesn't carry as much weight when you can simply point back and say "Bt Dr Rosenberg, you said the Earth would be a snowball by now"
Carson Martinez
>cold weather is ice
Ye i remember winter 2010 when an ice shelf swallowed most of the united states.
Colton Bell
Its a map of sea ice and snow cover. My point is seasonal sea ice fluctuates, therefore early explorers might not get the edges of Antarctica right. Keep deflecting, play linguistics game, and post more pepes though as if you're so smart
Alexander Nelson
No, I present actual evidence showing that there was no scientific agenda in the 1970s among scientists claiming the earth was cooling. The vast majority of earth science papers on climate change published at this time (which was still a small amount because the field was just emerging then) was focused on a warming planet, not a cooling one. You can post whatever newspaper or magazine articles you want, that does not change this fact. What is published in the scientific literature is what matters, that's how those doing actual scientific research communicate their ideas to their colleagues, and it clearly shows when you look at the evidence that the entire cooling consensus is fraudulent.
realclimate.org
skepticalscience.com
Do some reading, though I know you won't because it won't confirm your incredibly deep biases. Head is stuck way too far up your own ass to see facts and evidence at this point.