Explain this

>women being discriminated against in 2017
>2010+7
What world do you live in? The only people that are discriminated against in this country are white males.

probably jewish women didn't want those jobs and they refused to hire gentiles, sorry, hard to get mad about it, shrug

>but also more male dumbasses.
Which is why you see more men reviewing "classics" in acts of public intellectual masturbation - that 3:1 autism ratio means there's a lot more male autists pretending to understand Sun-Tzu and Socrates out there than women.

This gender gap bullshit is a waste of time and energy for anyone who participates in it, left and right. Are you proud, OP, that this thread killed a more worthy one?

have you tought that maybe there are not a lot of women who want to work as a book reviewer.

No this is clearly not the case you fuckers. My mother wants to be a book reviewer but every time she gets an interview they tell her to fuck off because she's a woman. You can't be this blind. Discrimination is real.

Logistic investigations and survey tend to take quantity judgement. Most of these women who read at least one book a year read really low brow literature, meaning that few women
(of the ones portrayed in the survey) don't have the professional profile to review or write substancial articles for publication.

I like this game of putting people into boxes. It's fun and satisfying.

maybe your mother just fucking sucks at writing, writing isn't investment banking, you can't just swap out some protestants for nignogs and milfs and everything is the same, writing actually takes talent

>reading a book is the same as critiquing a book

i bet you're a woman

>they tell her to fuck off because she's a woman.