Wikipedia: Hilbert's tenth problem is the tenth on the list of mathematical problems that the German mathematician David Hilbert posed in 1900. It is the challenge to provide a general algorithm which, for any given Diophantine equation (a polynomial equation with integer coefficients and a finite number of unknowns) can decide whether the equation has a solution with all unknowns taking integer values.
I think it's the sum of the numbers * 3 (1 + 5) * 3 = 18 (2 + 10) * 3 = 36 (3 + 15) * 3 = 54 (4 + 20) * 3 = 72
Ethan Green
me too
Joshua Foster
I took the left side added up and subtracted it from the right. Then every subsequent number is previous number + 12 minus the numbers on the left added up.
So 18-6=12 36-12=24 54-18=36 72-24=48
Ryan Taylor
72
Adrian Howard
72 because....
Left column of 18, 36, 54 goes 1, 3, 5 ... I guess the next should be 7.
Right column of 18, 36, 54 goes 8, 6, 4 ... I guess the next should be 2.
72.
Then I saw everyone else already got there using better maths, I just drew lines in my head.
Landon Price
I like better than because it is as if there is an invisible variable x = 3 on the left side that you are solving for.
James Barnes
Did you even fucking READ the wikipedia article. IT HAS BEEN PROVED NEGATIVELY. Utter fucking dumb mongrel, unironically kys.
Nathan Ramirez
sorry i am american who can do math
Brayden Richardson
...
Eli Edwards
Modular arightmetic can solve some of it.
Suppose we want to examine:
x^2 + xy + z^2 + yz = 0
By Fermat's little theorem for primes p
a^p = a (mod p)
we have
x + xy + z + yz = 0 (mod 2) x + z = -xy - yz (mod 2) x + z = -y(x + z) (mod 2) 1 = -y (mod 2) y = 1 (mod 2)
Another example:
w^3 + x^3 = y^3 + z^3 w + x = y + z (mod 3)
which is:
w + x = y + z + 3k w + x - y - z - 3k = 0
And all possible solutions can be given straightforwardly.
Gavin Brooks
that is fucked
Levi Adams
But there is a way for every equation right? Even if there isn't a general algorithm?
Mason Adams
Worst case scenario you just try to find solutions and realize there are none or there is at least one but every time you might have to do that differently (for different equations).
Samuel Fisher
>Corresponding to any given consistent axiomatization of number theory, one can explicitly construct a Diophantine equation which has no solutions, but such that this fact cannot be proved within the given axiomatization.
Scientifically speaking, why does God hate us?
Sebastian Murphy
Took me less than 15 seconds to realize its x=3 for every equation. Answer is 72.
t. my first minute on Veeky Forums Is this brainlet genius-wannabees board?
Connor Perez
>took me less than 15 seconds >15 seconds user, I....
Aaron Sanders
Trivial. We accept the first statement as a fact, then the rest follows by multiplication.