What papers are you reading?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

math.harvard.edu/~lurie/papers/GoodwillieI.pdf
webusers.imj-prg.fr/~leila.schneps/grothendieckcircle/EGA/EGAI.pdf
www-users.math.umn.edu/~kwlan/documents/french-glossary.pdf
mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/Math-Net/Lehrveranstaltungen/Lehrmaterial/SS2003/Topology/separation.pdf
pnas.org/content/104/17/7301.long
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

And what paper is that?

Hey Veeky Forums when did you realize that category theory is a load of shit and that pure is stupid?

Studying category theory for category theory is stupid. But category theory, and higher category theory, were invented to solve problems in algebra/geometry/topology. So studying it for that purpose is not stupid.

math.harvard.edu/~lurie/papers/GoodwillieI.pdf

&

webusers.imj-prg.fr/~leila.schneps/grothendieckcircle/EGA/EGAI.pdf

You're reading a paper on (∞,2)-categories and EGA?

EGA 1, with www-users.math.umn.edu/~kwlan/documents/french-glossary.pdf

Lurie's is a curiosity.

Why the higher category theory? It seems like a pretty dry subject when not properly motivated.

Just a curiosity. What are you into?