Help me with solving this equatation please!

So as you see this is a fucked up equatation, that states:

2*x^x = y^y + z^z, while x,y,z are positive integers.

We have to find all the possible solutions, and give an answer stating while are these the only possible solutions.

Translation Mode = Executive God
翻译模式=行政上帝
קוסגרוב

Trivial solution : x=y=z=0
Easy solution : x=y=z=1

I don't know if there are more and if there isn't, I can't say why.

We start off by noticing that x and y are either both even or both odd, if precisely one of them is even then x^x + y^y wouldnt be even.

Now assume that both x and y are even, this implies that the right hand side has an even multiplicity of 2 (its the sum of two numbers with even multiplicity of 2).

2 either has even multiplicity or a multiplicity of 0 in x^x (if x is odd its 0 and if x is even i hope you can see why the multiplicity is even). So 2 will always have odd multiplicity in 2*x^x, a contradiction.

y and z must therefore both be odd, that's the best I can do buddy.

I'd generate the first 100 solutions using a simulation, then try to find a relationship between the solutions.

Your "trivial solution" doesn't make sense. What's 0^0?

I'm assuming we're talking integers here.

When x=y=z, there is only one solution (this reduces to fermat's last theorem). Wild guess: for all x,y,z there is only the the solution x=y=z=1 for the integers, since you can just consider
x^k * x^n = y^j * y^n + z^l * z^n
where k+n = x, j+n = y and l+n = z

When in doubt, just take
f(x, y, z) = 2*x^x - y^y + z^z = 0
and differentiate if you're not only considering integer solutions.

>What's 0^0

1 you mong

>What's 0^0?
it's 1, do you even math?

>0^0 is a trivial solution
k

uh huh, alright
so... what is the limit of x^(1/ln(x)) as x -> 0+?

>Your "trivial solution" doesn't make sense. What's 0^0?
1. This board is for people who have passed middle school algebra, thank you

Indeterminate, thankfully we aren't dealing with limits but rather ordinary algebra.

>he tries to disprove 0^0=1 by taking a limit that behaves like 0^-inf
hey hey kids! how are those high school math competitions and numberphile videos?

hehe, my mistake I never saw the "1/", regardless, 0^0=1.

how ironic

0^0 = 0^(0-0) = 0^0/0^0 = 0/0 = undefined

retards

wow congrats guess you disproved the binomial theorem

and the power rule of differentiation

1 = 0^0 = 0^(0-0) = 0^0/0^0 = 1/1 = 1

>1 = 0^0
how did you get to this step?

oh whoops
I meant
0^0/0^0 = (0/0)^0
which is undefined

well put it in an online graphing calculator, and it has resulted in an undefined solution.

you may or may not understand order of operations but your calculator is assuming you do

its 2(x^x) not 2x^x. Fix it and try again.

>x = 0^0 = 0^(0-0) = 0^0/0^0 = x/x = 1

>x = 0^0 = (0/0)^0 = (x^-0)/(x^-0)^0 = (0/0)^0 = undefined

0 ln 0 = 0
0^0 = exp(0 ln 0) = 1

>0 * ln 0 = 0

but that's wrong
>ln 0 = -inf
>0 * ln 0 = 0 * -inf = undefined

x=y=z works for every number 2,3,4..... . So infinite solutions already.
I'll think if there are more or this is it.

I meant 0,1,2,3,4,5.....

Trolled you