Why isn't this valid?

That is really only true if you use the real world as a basis. The image in OP is essentially assuming that the earth is a closed system with no output or input.

...

Disregarding the fact that that's not how climate works, the amount of energy released in this manner is negligible. Found a source that we currently use around 5*10^20 joules/year, ocean mass is 10^24.
So total world energy use would only be enough to raise ocean temperature .001 degrees/year.

>we currently use around 5*10^20 joules/year
For heating? How do you know what bombs go off in other countries, forest fires, Gas fires, volcanic eruptions, people exercising, rubbing their dicks constantly.

How do these variables even get an idea of how to include outside variables.

Here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption

Why do you cucks reply to this shit?

Sort this crap out Veeky Forums it's fucking embarrassing.

aha do you know how much energy the earth receives from the sun every day? what do you think makes the temperature change from the cold night to a hot day. human activity is a drop in the ocean compared to that.
and what do you think makes the temperature drop from the hot midday to cold nights if not for radiation.
also, this doesn't affect what you're arguing about but it's good to know that the input output equation isn't linear in a lot of physical cases - if you have more heat in a system, it will radiate faster.

the heat island effect is localized but:
GLOBAL warming
>NIGGERFAGGOTS
NIGGERFAGGOTS
>NIGGERFAGGOTS
NIGGERFAGGOTS

What do you think about night time or winter. when millions of people everyday blast their furnace or burn a bunch of wood into the atmosphere?

That heat doesn't just automatically turn into light and fly away.

Wait hold on... so you guys believe a small amount of invisible gas has a bit to do with heating the earth... but that man setting fires, manipulating heat energy, and touching their dick all day can't even make a dent?

Man, Veeky Forums is retarded.

Also, the atmosphere/gas has a heatcapacity about 1000x lower than water.

That would mean the global climate temperatures would grow approx 1 degree a year by that conclusion (Which I believe it does because the polar ice caps are melting at latent heat. So it probably keeps global temperatures relatively stagnant).

You can heat a house, which the ratio to the house to the atmosphere is minuscule.

But 3 billion houses, burning and touching their dicks? Whew, that's a bit different.

Ive never understood what exactly it is that climate deniers are denying.

We have the physical mechanisms of processes such as how gases trap heat, how atoms jump/descend energy levels, etc

We have verified evidence of temperatures, water levels, etc

What exactly are climate deniers denying? I dont think they can even answer that

>we're directly heating the entire Earth
rudum

>That heat doesn't just automatically turn into light and fly away.
It literally does. The frequency distribution depends on temperature, though.

They are denying that humans have noticeable impact on climate change.
Saying that one volcano eruption has greater impact than what 5 billions of people are up to for several years.

It's the tobacco affair all over again. Even some of the snake oil sellers are the same.

duckduckgo.com/?q=merchants of doubt

do you have a single quantitative statement to back up your lay person's intuition? Do you know how the greenhouse effect works? If you know about the laws of thermodynamics, surely you know about the law of conservation of energy? If the heat that radiates into space is less in proportion to the heat received/generated on Earth, then there's a net increase. CO2 scatters infrared light (AKA heat energy, in the form of EM radiation). This not a subject of debate, and is proven experimentally and theoretically (quantum mechanics). Claiming that it has nothing to do with global warming is like claiming you can walk off a cliff without falling.

According to Trump's tweets pointing out how cold weather events happening in winter are proof that climate change is fake, they are denying that it's happening at all, and are so completely ignorant of these physical processes that they don't have to deny them.

skepticalscience.com/volcanoes-and-global-warming-intermediate.htm

We all know the physical reasons why we all have to drink water.
We all know the danger that deadly shootings cause.

Since we know that water is necessary to live, reducing water consumption will reduce deadly shootings.

This is how retarded you sound. You know the thermodynamics apply on local levels, like the size of a warehouse. Yes it probably also applies to the earth as a system. Just because the science allows it, doesn't mean it's hapoening.

Also, models that predict warming based on emissions use data assuming temperatures were caused from x amount of co2 emissions (ice core).
It's literally circular logic and cannot be proven using the "facts" tars like you sperg.

Humans don't produce enough heat to account for the rise in temperature. The CO2 doesn't come from solely from large corporations, it comes from almost all of use burning hydrocarbons, directly or indirectly

skepticalscience.com/waste-heat-global-warming.htm

yeah but I gotta hand it to Trump
this was a cold-ass winter wtf

>cold-ass winter
Not on the west coast even.
This is not global, not even close.

not just that, many different human activities either release ghg emissions or prevent ghgs from being sequestered as efficiently
like deforestation for example, not only did you just shrink a carbon sink for the future you also released carbon into the atmosphere because of all the decomposing wood
There's others like urbanization and whatnot, nature is a delicate balance.

Well I'm Canadian, it hasn't been this cold since the 70s (not that I was around). Thankfully it just warmed up this week.

You think this is a companies fault. that people starting fires in their back yard releasing years of energy on the earth into a firey pit of fire has nothing to do with this?

I think you guys just don't want to put the blame onto yourselves, thinking that it's "Just carbon dioxide" Meanwhile you just set gas fires and rub your dick all day to a indian rub burn heat.

I think if people released less heat, the CO2 may have an effect, but the heat produced from engines, snow plows, fires, etc is a major issue.

2014 was pretty cold. I remember seeing a toilet frozen in Toronto.

Seek help

Retard, we can directly measure the amount of heat being radiated from CO2 in the atmosphere. It's not only possible, it's proven to be occurring. Fuck off.

You don't understand physics.

Nocoiner detected

>Why isn't this valid?
Both the top and bottom are invalid since climate change is only theoretical, not something that exists in nature

does rubbing your dick really affect climate change?
the left is right we really should cut off our peckers

>water levels
no such a thing

Start with this to at least gain an appreciation of where your incompetence lies. At the moment you are at the bottom of the ladder of competence meaning not only that you are wrong, but also that you are unaware of where and why you are wrong.
Either learn some chemistry or go back to /pol/.

god "muh heat causes global warmming" are the new falt earthers