Will they get us to the Moon or to Mars?

He's an alpha politician so mainly a top, but not afraid to do anal play for the lulz

>pence
>alpha
butt he’s pretty much owned by his wife, user

*but

Ditsy DeVious

10000? I fucking wish. I'd be happy if we got another 50 years. Even well before the planet is uninhabitable, there will be mass panic and collapse, so one has to account for that too.

Forgot the:
>Secretary of State - ExxonMobil

Nah!
Neither one knows (or cares about) science.
The important thing is un-doing Obama's plan.

What was Obama’s plan?

kek

No. Like every president/VP since Kennedy/Johnson, they will express support for some "visiony" mission to which they will not dedicate sufficient resources and for which they have not built a lasting base of support.

(Kennedy/Johnson DID build that base nd did dedicate the resources, of course.)

Trump want the Moon just because Obama wanted Mars.

Oh, okay. How can we fix America’s current anti-science stance? Do we get rid of Trump and the Repubs?

We might make it despite them, but they will take the credit for it

Jfk was a super cyborg raised by a team of twelve elites who eventually all killed eachother. He went inside over half of mankind.

>People who say things i dont like are the "deep state" boogey man.
You have go back.

Doesnt matter, have to stop it

Reform of our political and uducation system lead by those who truly carry the interest of the american people at heart and cannot be bought or had. Its a tall order for sure.

A good start would be making the USA a democracy. No more of that "all votes are equal, but some are more equal than others" bullshit

Dont say that, youll make the trump trolls attack. Fair elections atlre not ojay becuase that means a blacks vote is as good as a whites and thats not acceptable.

Not really. In other federalist countries there may not be a perceived requirement to weigh provinces based on certain conditional factors simply because they're not like our system of states, but in the US, the electoral college is actually a very clever tool to prevent serious voting hazards and pitfalls that come from any direct democracy, especially in an environment built around states first and foremost.

It's about states receiving equal representation and relevance during legislative matters, not an unfair election weapon to oppress minorities like some retards make it out to be; shit like that just cheapens the understanding of gerrymandering. The states are designed to be largely autonomous and independent while appealing to a larger federal government, the electoral college is there to ensure just that. The USA wouldn't even make it as a country for a decade if it adopted complete democracy, unless it magically became some unitary landmass and all disputes with other states just didn't exist.

You *could* make the argument that states should not become winner-take-all, though, e.g. if say Oklahoma as a whole is roughly 70% candidate X, 30% candidate Y, so the corresponding rounded-down percentage of electoral votes is given to each candidate. Or potentially as I've heard from other suggestions, you could give the winner of the state the total state electoral votes, but the loser(s) of the state would still receive an amount of electoral votes relative to the total number of votes they still received in that state, like a consolation prize; I've never really thought about how practical this second solution is, though, it's just more of a theoretical concept that could be hashed out.

Or we could just try incorporating ranked voting altogether. I've seen nothing but good results for the nations that apply such voting measures.

>United States of America
>States
What did they mean by this?

>Planet survives for billions of years with life on it for more than half of that time
>A species that exists for the tiniest fraction of that time somehow destroys it
You guys are hilarious.

denying science and historical revisionism is leftist SJW's bread and butter

"Uninhabitable for humans as they exist today" isnt the same as "destroyed"

If you dont think we can make the earth uninhabitable for oursleves, youre retarded. Weve done it on a scale thats only small by comparisson hudreds of thousands of times

Bill Nye never said that. Gender and Sex have been known to be different things for years.

>Will they get us to the Moon or to Mars?

Just like every president before him.

cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/01/14/bush.space/

fortune.com/2016/10/11/president-barack-obama-mars/

You cant twll people from pol the truth amd expect them to listen. That men has been floating around for well over. A year now despite no being real.

Gender refers to the traits we think of a sex as having as i understand it.

Sex refers to your biological makeup, so male or female.

Its useful to seperate the terms in order discuss the conspets and ideas we come across.

Democracy is easily the biggest fucking meme ever invented. The greeks learnt this the hard way

I agree, but bastardizations of democracy are even worse

Letting majorities decide over minorities is stupid, but letting minorities decide over majorities is straight up retarded

neither americas space program has been dead since 2008

Where the fuck did the excitement fro the mars exploration rovers and titan landers go?

nobody gives a shit about asteroids unless you are going to bruce willis it

>>nobody gives a shit about asteroids
People gave a shit about Rosetta. Just wait until our asteroid probes actually get to asteroids. Osiris Rex will get to Bennu in August. The psyche mission should be pretty cool once we get it there.

lots of people who are alpha in their professional and public lives are actually total bottoms in their sexual lives.

Democracy produces the best results out of all current governmental systems. Look at the best places to live and you'll notice they tend to be democracies. Even when you compare nations with similar GDP per capita (which measures how much wealth there is to go around), democracies outperform other governments in terms of standard of living. You may not like the concept, but the evidence indicates that it's the best we've got.

>le people in space meme

fucking worthless waste of money
anything we can want can get with robots

>If you ever had a job in the private sector you should be banned from holding any forms of office

Until we actually unironically start colonising other planets, this
The only time we put a man on the moon, we didn't do it for science but to win a massive globe-wide dick comparing contest and to this day it's the only purpose of putting a man on other celestial bodies
I'd argue the ISS may be easier to maintain with people on board because there is a lot of shit to do but that may soon change with the advent of better and cheaper robotics

the future is not now: robots are shit, space travel is shit, there's no cure for anything
we're living in a black-and-white photo

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest
Please repeat grade school. No one said non-politicians should be banned from public office, but it sure as he'll isn't in the favor of the US voter to put them there.

>republicans
>science funding
>or really government funding of any kind that doesn't benefit oil tycoons or other major conglomerates

It amazes me how fucking dense you nerds can be, sometimes.