Author tells me to verify his statement

>author tells me to verify his statement
>I don't and keep reading

>author says (think)
>I don''t

>author writes book
>I don't read it

>author says: "students often make this mistake on exams:"
>proceed to make that mistake on exam

>author says "see reference 1A2B4CASDJFA!@#L!@L#K!L"
>find reference in reference section after sifting through 600 pages, picture of cat with trivial non-relevant excerpt

>Author says "let".

>I don't let.

>let [math]\epsilon\in\mathbb{R}[/math]
dropped

>author says see example
>I see all

>I use n as a continuous variable and z as a discrete variable

>solve this system using substitution
>i use elimination

>Author asks (why?)
>Pretend I didn't hear him and keep on reading

fucker

>author says we can't use l'hopital's rule unless under certain conditions
>use it anyways

>author says "in the previous edition we went over this"
>return book

>"prove it in excercise #XX"
>skip it

>author tells me to revise some pre-req material for the next section
>Never learned any of the pre-req stuff in the first place

>a simple check will do
>extensively check it

>"recall"
>don't recall

This is devilish.

>Use L'Hopital to prove a derivative using circular reasoning
Best feel

>assume generalized RH to be true
>then RH is true as a corollary

>author thanks me for buying their book
>I pirated it

>assume epsilon>0
>continuously tell prof hes wrong when epsilon=0
∆

>author tells me to prove that figure a is true
>prove that it's false instead

>author tells me to verify his statement
why?

i reported you all to rudin. enjoy getting integrated with his fist.

i mean lhopital is extremely intuitive. i just took it as a given before i even knew what it was.