>can't into philosophy free of the obsession with mathematics
You won't find any serious philosophy scholar dismissive of either traditions. The only people who do that are underage autismos blindly repeating le funny meme on the internet and English lit majors who think reading a couple of original sources and picking up the terminology makes them an expert in the field, yet still have an allergic reaction to anything that involves rigorous thought and not just pseudointellectual wallowing in pointless vague nonsense (a remark solely upon their personal ability and not continental philosophy itself).
>formal logic is basically a scam
>They are arbitrary mathematical constructions
Nobody is really interested in correcting your severe educational deficiencies or engaging in contrarian shitposting with an imbecile. Spend more time reading instead of pretending to be retarded online, then you might even actually comprehend all those things that scare you so much.
Redpill me on Saul Kripke
>you won't find any serious philosophy scholar dismissive of either traditions
Metaphysics is still considered a rude word in some circles, the Anglo autists were hell-bent on turning philosophy into a little bitch of natural sciences.
>nobody is really interested in yadda yadda ad hominem
Here's a little thinking material for you friendo: according to classical logic and its definition of the material implication, I can safely conclude that the following implication is valid: if I do not exist, then 2+2=4 (hint: there is no relevant link between the antecedent and the consequent). "Natural" deduction is anything but natural - it is merely, as I already said, an arbitrary mathematical construction, nothing else.
One more thing: it's ridiculous how you assume that I have zero understanding of the things I'm talking about, and then while trying to dismiss my arguments on the basis of idiotic ad hominems you actually prove that you indeed are the retard without any relevant knowledge whatsoever. Also, I'm literally inside the academia (philosophy). Top fucking kek
I like this thread
>Metaphysics is still considered a rude word in some circles, the Anglo autists were hell-bent on turning philosophy into a little bitch of natural sciences.
Not who you're replying to, but why don't you like Kripke? He quite literally rehabilitated the practice of metaphysics.
>is he really the best team analytic has to offer?
Nah brah, Kripke is Jew-tier analytic
Muh nigga D M Armstrong is God-tier
Because I don't give a flying fuck about some autist's logical framework that supposedly "revives metaphysics". Kripke's essentialism "revives" (or rather, attempts to "revive") metaphysics in the disgusting linguistic paradigm. Reducing philosophy to language is a heresy.
Because Descartes did the same 500 years ago without going 150% autistic wankery
>cogito ergo sum
there you go, thanks a lot analytic philosophy! you sure are doing amazing progress! reals > muh feels amirite!
kys
>In the (distant or not that distant, I hope) future the philosophical paradigm of the linguistic turn shall be frowned upon, and rightfully so.
It really shows that you have fuck all knowledge of contemporary philosophy, both analytic and continental.
epic rebutal
There was nothing to refute in your post, I'm just merely pointing out that you're retarded. Guess I did not make myself clear enough.