NUMBERPHILE BTFO AND ON SUICIDE WATCH

so his beef is that numberphile wasn't rigorous with their definitions of summation. we didn't need a forty minute video for that, people have been saying that since the numberphile video came out

>numberphile
Someone post the greentext, you know which one.

Fuck off back to Rebbit with your bait thread.

yw

thank you user, thank you

Oh here it is, the daily and perfectly-timed post against numberphile
I’m sure all of you are acquiring great joy in bashing a single video out of hundreds where the result isn’t even wrong but is just exposed poorly. It’s so satisfying to laugh at a pretty light-hearted math channel thinking it is some kind of MIT university course, right? And speaking of university, I’m totally certain that know more than any of their stupid hosts who are just shitty professors with years of experience and research behind them and have achieved more than you’ll ever do in your shitty existences
Fair enough I guess

>t. grime

I fucking lost my shit the first time I saw this. Good times.

...

Go away Tony. Come back when you have tenure.

Why do you cringey brainlets post this thread?

Why do you bump this thread?

Why does he keep laughing awkwardly in between sentences?

Because he's mocking the Numberphile plebs.

youtube.com/watch?v=fhDIsDv5oyc

>The Chad Numberphile vs Virgin HS Teacher

Thanks for sharing this. I always was confused as fuck by those -1/12 vids, plus I like Mathologer better than the rest.

I can resist watching Number Chadski's off the cuff lessons.

Now THAT was a fucking math video....

I totally want a shirt like dude has.

Numberphile confirmed for shit.

You tripfags pollute this board. Go away.

>You tripfags pollute this board. Go away.

Nice proprietary retort, faggot.

>No you!!!!
Leave.

>Leave.

after you.

>faggot
Why the self-hatred?

>THEY ARE SO WRONG!!!

>They are actually kinda right, they just use "sum" instead of "supad dumpa ultra mega cool epic sum"

>Big chin Lanister VS no chin bong face

>Why the self-hatred?

What do you mean?

Whoa he's going for the double ruse

>Whoa he's going for the double ruse

what are you implying?

absolute mathkino

wow numberphile got raped

>making the same thread i made 2 days ago
Kys

Not in a math fight, no. Isn't Khan just an engineer?

sue me faget

Remember, kids, don't do math

Is that animatronic

da fuq is this?

Looks like heroin withdrawal.

That you are gay

German autism

Is he okay?

Which is hugely important, it's like they're claiming 1 + 1 = 0 and the video is saying that's wrong except if you redefine + to be subtraction.

What does the "t." stand for? I see this all the time and just have a vague idea what it means. Yes, I'm a brainlet.

it's finnish for "regards", used on Veeky Forums to suggest that a certain person made the post that is being replied to

Sounds like a bad analogy to me.

it uses invalid maths. causing many people to get confused. either do it the right way or don't do it at all.

I want to kill myself now.

That's fucking retarded, 1+1 already has a clear value. A divergent sum doesn't so you might as well repurpose the equal sign. As soon as there is a contender for that value you can add a sub-script or something.

Thanks.

>you might as well repurpose the equal sign
only if you make it clear what you're doing. especially to numberphile's audience who only know ~1 mathematical meaning of the equal sign

Honestly "t." should enter mainstream English, it's so useful.

???

>A divergent sum doesn't
the fact that it is a divergent sum means that it is clear that it does not equal a finite value.

if it did then it would be convergent, which it is not.

only convergent sums equal finite numbers, retard.

If you want to say that divergent sums can "imaginary-equal" finite numbers then come up with a new symbol you fucking hack.

Why the fuck come up with a new sign when we have a perfectly good sign that just became available?
No, those people don't matter at all, the real issue might be series that aren't clear if they converge or not and you just assign it a value. But luckily the manipulations done in the numberphile video are valid for convergent ones so there is no issue there.

WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK IS THIS?

BLUE BOARD

silent hill

Why do you bump his bump?

>sponsored by your taxes

Literally me

Ah I knew this motherfucker was a tanned german. What a salty dude. Normies wouldnt have got the real explanation had it been showed

But equal sign was repurposed for convergent series too. It doesn't mean an actual sum, but rather limit of sequence of partial sums.
And because some divergent series sometimes behave kinda like convergent series we also repurposed = for them

how'd these shit cunts get so popular

Because more find math pretty interesting,
and maths in NP is presented in an fairly easy to consume way

He's an actor.

go away Hans!

1+2=3
1+2+3=6
1+2+3+4=10
It's getting bigger and bigger. Repeat the process forever and you get infinity. I swear mathematicians make shit up to justify their existence.

this is fake right??

Just saw this. Made a video response:

youtu.be/4xCny2YXYTc

Excuse my autism.

We have it in English.

Just saw this. Excuse my autism, but I thought of making a response video here

youtu.be/t-DyR-Eheok

Why did you remove it?

that link is just the mathologer video

Had a typo in "Establishment". Reuploading is a hasle but if you leave it in you get a bunch of useless responses pointing it out :P
And sadly I'm a bit late to the party. But there you go

youtu.be/ACzk0OqSXzM

it's 1:20 here, sorry

what really motivates james from numberphile?

youtube money

Just looked for it, apparently this guy has a degenerative disorder and his family is very poor, they can't buy him a wheelchair and meds, they suspended him so he doesn't feel sore

no it's not, it's severe radiation poisoning
Fukushima maybe, idk

source?

beady eyes, anglo lies ect