> mfw when some company feeds AI math textbooks
> it starts producing formulas and proofs
> everything not very clear as it read
> and everyone is accepting them out of fear of opposing an authority or out of mere laziness and lack of interest
mfw when some company feeds AI math textbooks
Connor Cook
Other urls found in this thread:
Veeky
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Evan Sanchez
...
Ayden Williams
That book is outdated horseshit. Stop posting it.
Sebastian Hall
The literal fuck. How is it outdated?
Carter Nguyen
> some company feeds AI math textbooks
> it starts producing formulas and proofs
> everything not very clear as it read
> only reasonable things it wrote are "proof left as an exercise" and "proof: trivial"
Chase Bell
Thanks Anonymous, I'll have a read
Jayden Torres
he thinks machine learning and AI are the same thing
this book doesn't have that much on ML so it must be outdated horseshit
Robert Cook
I liked this book, I was lazy in my AI class and didn't read it fully but I might again.
Jace Collins
>> mfw when
>my face when when
Liam Rivera
It doesn't have all the latest buzzwords and that's all I care about. I don't want to understand AI but speculate on the coming singularity sexbots that are going to take all our jobs with data mining!
John Morales
Is there a follow up book for this? I read it, and it helped me implement AI in my game, but is there a book with more advance techniques/broader scope?
Jonathan Martin
Aiden Gutierrez
en.wikipedia.org
that's not even me, obviously there was someone else before
Logan Ward
...
John Stewart
But that list is shit, it doesn't even have elements of statistical learning, which is the standard ML textbook.
Evan Baker
what company are you talking about?
Brody Young
>which is the standard ML textbook
For brainlets.
Bishop is better.
Hunter Price
Well, the book is about GOFAI
Oliver Mitchell
bishop is essential machine learning reading
Elijah Hall
Other than just shitting on Kurzweil why are people saying the singularity can't happen?
I understand that the so-called "exponential curve" of tech advancement isn't really a thing (it's misapplying Moore's law to all tech) but AI IS getting better, what's to say in a few decades we wont have built a super-intelligence?
David Rodriguez
None. OP is role-playing.
Kayden Carter
if everyone would understand what he says he wouldn't be a genius, would he?
Leo Brooks
The joke here being, which escapes most of the plebs on these boards, is that one of the authors of that textbook (Stuart Russell) is one of those who are saying stuff like that.
Gabriel Adams
Yeah but the point to pull the curtain and show how the magician does his trick and bring AI from "greater than life" wonder to "down to earth" practice. Then you'll have a significantly large enough grain of salt to contextualize discussion of future AI.