Such that

>such that

>theoretically breaking the laws of

>the proof is trivial

>therefore

>let

>that which

>exists

>whence

>aforementioned

>left as an exercise for the reader

>(why?)

>then it must

Professors who throw around inverses and derivatives without considering their existence are the worst.
t. guy studying existence of discrete structures

.
. .

nice try

>So that

>he rates zidane

>consider

>=>

[math]\therefore[/math]

herein thus far

>therefore
>however
>although
>additionally
>furthermore
these are all legit and useful

>necessarily

obviously

>the proof is trivial

> up to

>proof: ask your professor