/sqt/ Stupid Questions Thread

protip to help you remember pi you can use the apporimation 314,159/100,000

>how do babies make any evolutionary sense? they are completly dependent untill about age 7 or so, so for those 7 years you have to waste time and energy to this thing that cannot fend for itself
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory

i have the first 60 digits of pi tattooed on my dick so if i ever need it on a test, i just get hard on the spot. fuck memorization

If the uniform metric C(X,Y) on metric spaces X and Y is complete, does that entail that Y is complete?

Can anyone give me a straight answer on what specific algorithm's are used to generate/compute new prime numbers are? I really would like to know because I think I may have stumbled onto a relatively trivial way of computing increasingly large prime numbers but I feel like it may already be utilized and I honestly don't even fully understand why it works.

Pic unrelated btw

Anyone have any good recs doe basic logic? I remember taking an intro to logic class back in college. I don't remember a lot, just basically that it was 'math with words' I remember one of the rules was a motis ponens(sp?) and it basically let you set up logic problems and use those rules to confirm or deny. I'm just looking for a decent comprehensive book that will cover the basics.

i saw this exact post work for word on r badmath you fucking c*ck. go back to r#ddit

non-inertial reference frames are garbage; it's hard to predict anything with them. dp/dt is the definition of force, so it always applies, but it will be meaningless in a non-inertial frame.

Could you please attempt to offer an intelligent answer to my question instead of acting like a cunt to stroke your e-peen? It's a legitimate question that I've been going in circles trying to find a straightforward answer to.

-U cannot be a knight
-X contradicts Y and Z, thus he cannot be a knight
-Of the remaining possible knights, V can only be in agreement with W. This falls short of 3, so V cannot be a knight.
-if Z is correct, then W is also correct, leading to a contradiction. Z is not a knight.
-at this point we've eliminated 4 of the 6, so W is correct. If Y is wrong, that would make Z correct, leading to a contradiction. Thus, W and Y are knights.