This kills the /pol/edditor

>doesn't realize I'm a /pol/faggot too
>doesn't realize everyone he replied to is a /pol/faggot
>doesn't realize he himself is a /pol/faggot without knowing it
/pol/ is everywhere, even places it is not.

another authentic nerd moment

>By ideologues who haven't read it, yes
Acemoglu and Fukuyama?

Is there an actual argument against geographical determinism or just /pol/ reeeeing?

>whiteness isn't inherently good or bad

I'm okay with this. Don't blame white people. Blame geography.

Well, everything I disagree with is /pol/ reeeeing, so probably not

Not really. /pol/tards are scum, but I don't think GG&S does a good job of refuting them. Jared Diamond clearly started out with the fixed assumption that races are equal, and then spent a bunch of time backing up that assumption with speculations. It isn't really a free investigation into the truth of things.

Cont...
Although to be fair, I haven't read the book in years. Maybe I'm misremembering something.

This stands on the assumption that all humans were equal, blank slates who exploited the geographical resources around them to create unequal civilizations. If he weren't a subversive Jew he would have written that humans developed unequally because of geography and exploited the resources around them creating unequal civilizations.

Equality is a lie.

Geographic determinism is embraced by /pol/ if you don't come at it with the assumption that all humans are equal. Which makes no fucking sense why JD would come at it from that perspective. The only way his theory makes any sense is by coming at it from a biblical sense in that humans were created fully developed and only came to be unequal due to the geographical resources in their settled areas.