Being gay isn't normal. Should homosexuality occurring in nature mean nothing in the face of this statement because animals are mindless and therefore shouldn't be taken as a reference, or does it disprove it because of the same reason i.e. that animals, who operate on instinct, engage in it and therefore the occurrence of it in humans is also completely natural? If it were natural and not an aberration then why do only a minority of people experience it? Any logical line of reasoning will lead to the conclusion that it's not supposed to happen. Is there any more evidence supporting either of these arguments?
Being gay isn't normal...
Jackson Moore
Nathaniel Hall
>Being gay isn't normal.
define "normal"
>therefore the occurrence of it in humans is also completely natural
Everything that occurs is by trivially "natural".
Adam Lee
>Everything that occurs is by trivially "natural".
brainlet
Anthony Diaz
Evolution operates on a bell curve so it can naturally find the best course for survival. That means that it continually needs to produce oraganisms outside what you consider normal. But to nature, there is no normal. It is all a necessary part of the spectrum. We are all 100% we unique and original, and should be celebrated that we share a part in this grand experiment of life.
Nolan Barnes
>brainlet
Unless you believe in the supernatural, then the statement is trivially true.
Aaron Walker
brainlet
Andrew Brown
Let us say that normal defines average. If it were to be defined that way, it would not be normal.
Jayden Miller
“Do you know what lies at the bottom of the average? Mediocrity.” — Death in Venice. ;-)
Dylan Watson
Brainless
Liam Thompson
But why would homosexuality be a trait providing more fitness, since its sufferers most likely won't have children? It makes much more sense that homosexuality is a disorder/disease.